Profile | Americans for Tax Reform
Website | www.ATR.org
Author's Latest Posts |
- The Best We Can Get: Support H.R.3905
- White House Wages War on Free Speech
- Healthcare Bill Breaks Obama's Oft-Repeated Promise on Taxes
- Government Healthcare: Everyone is Equal, Some More Equal Than Others
- Cap and Trade: Price Controls Don't Exist in a Rational Market
More»
White House Wages War on Free Speech
By Americans for Tax Reform | 10/24/09 | 07:44 PM EDT | 5 Comments
It should go without saying that freedom of speech is an essential part of any democratic state. The freedom to criticize the government, to say what you think and feel, and to truly engage in the political process.
It is for this reason that I am somewhat disturbed by a recent trend that seems to be developing in some of the more recent actions of this Administration.
Earlier this year, there was a considerable push to reinstitute the “Fairness Doctrine”. This is a doctrine which effectively muzzles conservative talk-radio hosts, and prevents them from exercising their freedom of speech. As we have stated previously, this ironically named doctrine presents a grave threat to political thought and the freedom of ideas that distinguish America as the freest society in the world.
Then earlier this month, the Federal Trade Commission issued an 81 page document which significantly regulates the actions of bloggers, and also promoted a workshop discussing the creation of government-operated newspapers.
Of course, this is all in the context of President Obama’s radical plan regulate the internet, which, if passed, shall have incredibly serious deleterious consequences not just in terms of reducing bandwidth speed and increasing costs to consumers, but also as a potential introduction to even greater government regulation and ultimately censorship (the current bans on online poker are just the first step)
It is onto this backdrop that the Administration’s recent attacks on Fox News are especially worrying.
There can be little doubt that Fox News has been responsible for some of most in-depth investigations of the Obama Administration to date. While the Mainstream Media missed the three biggest stories of the year, Fox News has reported the facts and asked the difficult questions. In response, after Fox reported how the interim communications director for the White House praised genocidal murderer Chairman Mao (responsible for 40-80million deaths – more than any other man in history) as one of her greatest inspirations and favorite philosophers, the White House has responded with a blatant attack on Fox News, firstly saying that Fox was not a news outlet, calling upon all other media outlets to effectively boycott Fox, and to ignore any story that originates with them. Just think – the Executive Branch is now telling the media exactly what they should be doing. The implications are staggering.
This heated up yesterday, when the White House announced today that White House Press Pool access to Czar Feinberg would explicitly exclude Fox News, despite the fact that the Press Pool is part-funded by Fox. Fortunately, the other networks refused to comply with this, and the Administration was forced to reverse course.
It is not so much this one incident that is troubling – rather, it is the underlying theme of all of these events put together, one where undoubtedly free speech is slowly being ebbed away.
As one commentator noted: “When you look at this administration’s performance to date, it’s like the Democratic Party went out and found themselves a caricature of everything that they complained about/hated/feared with regard to George W Bush… only this time? It’s all true.”
| 
|
5 Comments | Related Topics »National
RECOMMENDED SITES
Comments
The Obama administration wants to silence their critics. Even the most liberal media organizations are opposed to White House attempts to silence Fox News.
- reply
|This is scary stuff. Obama is taking a page from the dictator handbook on this one. The inmates are running the asylum.
- reply
|Post a source for your claim that the Obama Administration has ever done anything to promote the Fairness Doctrine?
- reply
|Mark Lloyd, Obama's Chief Diversity Officer at the FCC, has advocated it for years.
I've pasted what I feel is the relevant section:
“The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) must be reformed along democratic lines and funded on a substantial level,” Lloyd wrote in his book.
“Federal and regional broadcast operations and local stations should be funded at levels commensurate with or above those spending levels at which commercial operations are funded,” Lloyd wrote. “This funding should come from license fees charged to commercial broadcasters. Funding should not come from congressional appropriations. Sponsorship should be prohibited at all public broadcasters.”
Along with this money, Lloyd would regulate much of the programming on these stations to make sure they focused on “diverse views” and government activities.
“Local public broadcasters and regional and national communications operations should be required to encourage and broadcast diverse views and programs,” wrote Lloyd [bolding and italics mine]. “These programs should include coverage of all local, state and federal government meetings, as well as daily news and public issues programming.
- reply
|Mark Lloyd, Obama's Chief Diversity Officer at the FCC, has advocated it for years.
I've pasted what I feel is the relevant section:
“The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) must be reformed along democratic lines and funded on a substantial level,” Lloyd wrote in his book.
“Federal and regional broadcast operations and local stations should be funded at levels commensurate with or above those spending levels at which commercial operations are funded,” Lloyd wrote. “This funding should come from license fees charged to commercial broadcasters. Funding should not come from congressional appropriations. Sponsorship should be prohibited at all public broadcasters.”
Along with this money, Lloyd would regulate much of the programming on these stations to make sure they focused on “diverse views” and government activities.
“Local public broadcasters and regional and national communications operations should be required to encourage and broadcast diverse views and programs,” wrote Lloyd [bolding and italics mine]. “These programs should include coverage of all local, state and federal government meetings, as well as daily news and public issues programming.
- reply
|Post new comment