I just returned from the Public Disclosure Commission's meeting where they discussed adopting guidelines for "Internet lobbying." Bottom line: the PDC decided to table the issue for future consideration. Two commissioners (Ken Schellberg and Dave Seabrook) were in favor of adopting the guidelines, and two (Jim Clements and Jane Noland) wanted more time to consider the issue. The fifth commissioner wasn't present, so the issue stalled. 

EFF submitted comments to the PDC by joining a letter written by the Institute for Justice. Other groups signed on the letter: Washington Coalition for Open Government, Washington Policy Center, and the Sound Politics blog.

I also spoke at the hearing. While we support the PDC's effort to keep the political process transparent, we are concerned that regulating blogs and websites will stifle individual speech. The PDC could offer all the clarification needed by simply stating: "activities that are reportable as lobbying do not enjoy an Internet loophole." 

One lobbyist who supported the guidelines suggested there no public outcry about this issue. At the risk of being classified as a blogger lobbyist, I'd suggest you contact the PDC with your opinion about the issue. The Commissioners are genuinely interested in exploring the pros and cons of this issue. You can email comments to Lori Anderson at landerson@pdc.wa.gov.