KING COUNTY (WA): Seattle Metropolitan and Surrounding Areas

 
 
 

Seattle P-I: No more Bush-league judges

Posted by: Michael Reitz | 10/09/2008 8:08 AM

Last month the Seattle Post-Intelligencer ran an op-ed piece from Seattle attorneys Leonard Feldman and Tom Burt. They say that when voters go to the polls in November, one of the most important issues will be the judges each candidate has pledged to nominate. But they have stern warnings about McCain's approach to judicial picks.

Americans will be making a choice between real change and a continuation of many of the policies of the Bush administration -- policies that McCain has endorsed repeatedly.

Our federal judges should be selected and appointed because they have a solid track record of intelligence, hard work and common sense, not because they will support the political and social agenda of the radical right.

I sent a letter to the editor in response, but imagine my surprise...it still hasn't been printed.

So here's what I wrote:

Leonard Feldman and Tom Burt painted a doomsday scenario should John McCain get elected and appoint conservative justices to the Supreme Court (Sept. 18 op-ed). I think they overstate the case.
 
To be a conservative jurist means understanding separation of powers: the legislative branch makes law, and the judicial branch interprets the law. And originalism--where justices seek to give the constitution the meaning it bore when the people adopted it--isn't extreme. It's just common sense. 
 
The president's politics are no sure prediction of how a judge will judge. Moderate and liberal justices Anthony Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, David Souter, and John Paul Stevens were all appointed by Republicans. The current Supreme Court, which Feldman and Burt seem to fear, has shown itself quite willing to buck the Bush Administration on major policy issues.
 
True, the next president will wield significant influence over the direction of the Supreme Court. John McCain has said he'll appoint justices who understand the clear limits to the scope of judicial power. Barack Obama has said he wants to appoint justices who have "heart" and "empathy"--apparently Obama thinks the Supreme Court needs more judges like American Idol's Paula Abdul.  

CATEGORY: McCain, Obama, The Courts

Select a Red County Blog

MEET THE LOCAL EDITOR
 
 

Recent Comments

11/15/2008 5:16 PM

Z commented about: Pictures of Fraudulent Democratic Election Letter

It may be ill advised, but it is apparently not "fraudulent" and certainly not election fraud. Forbes has...
 

11/12/2008 8:35 PM

Michael Reitz commented about: Attention bloggers, please file your lobbyist forms...

Lew, thanks for the comments. I think it's pretty easy for most folks to distinguish between paid lobbyists...
 

11/12/2008 7:28 PM

Doug commented about: Self Evident Truth: A Nation Divided

'A house divided cannot stand' if cultural opponents do not honor Law and Order. The First Amendment guarantees...
 

11/12/2008 4:28 PM

Lew McMurran commented about: Attention bloggers, please file your lobbyist forms...

Michael, thanks for posting this. As a registered lobbyist who also blogs I submitted comments that capture your...
 

11/12/2008 1:37 PM

April E. Coggins commented about: Are bloggers lobbyists?

Michael, what is the criteria for "news media?" How does one qualify as news media?...
 

11/12/2008 1:10 PM

Michael Reitz commented about: Are bloggers lobbyists?

Dana & April, the PDC has definitions for who qualifies as lobbyist. Two exceptions are citizens who are...
 

11/12/2008 1:06 PM

April E. Coggins commented about: Are bloggers lobbyists?

Dana, I'm not sure the definition of a lobbyist can be that straight forward. For example, can a...
 

11/12/2008 10:24 AM

John commented about: Are bloggers lobbyists?

Bloggers are considered lobbyists in Washington only if they are advocating for market-oriented or limited-government policies, especially policies...
 

11/11/2008 8:53 PM

Dana Callen commented about: Are bloggers lobbyists?

I do not think that citizens expressing their opinions should be considered to be lobbyists. If, however, a...
 

11/10/2008 8:10 PM

Doug commented about: No More Pity Party

Most people vote on the basis of economic self-interest, and McCain failed to win the confidence of voters...
 

11/09/2008 5:39 PM

Dave commented about: No More Pity Party

Dick Armey is wrong. He states that "Republicans lost control of Congress in 2006 because voters no longer...
 

11/08/2008 4:51 PM

maureen commented about: No More Pity Party

Angie Vogt is a tremendous writer and has served us up political meat and potatoes. It is clarity...
 

11/07/2008 12:47 AM

ARMY WIFE commented about: Barack Obama is My President

Perhaps he can now answer all the questions he had previously said were "not in his paygrade"...
 

11/06/2008 11:27 PM

J. Goldberg commented about: Highline School District Teachers Wearing Pro-Obama Paraphernalia

As a retired attorney who spend 31 years in the legal profession (8 years as a prosecuting attorney...
 

11/06/2008 11:08 PM

Melanie commented about: Barack Obama is My President

I really enjoyed your commentary. It's sad to say, but so many people (from both sides of the...
 

11/06/2008 9:19 PM

Anonymous commented about: Highline School District Teachers Wearing Pro-Obama Paraphernalia

No one has mentioned whether the specifics of RCW 29A 84.510 were actually violated. If the teacher stayed...
 

11/06/2008 4:10 PM

ANC commented about: Barack Obama is My President

Bob, Here read this from a CNN study: "Florida Supreme Court recount ruling On December 12, 2000, the...
 

11/06/2008 3:57 PM

RightThinkingWoman commented about: Barack Obama is My President

David H: You sound like one of the angry old geezers that give conservatives a bad name. Liberals...
 

11/06/2008 12:17 PM

Michael Kerr commented about: Barack Obama is My President

Angie, Outstanding! You illustrate a point in your message which reflects one of the great attributes of many...
 

11/06/2008 12:17 PM

Bob commented about: Barack Obama is My President

Tommy, While I generally like your comment I must take issue with one point. You said: "Unlike liberals...
 

What We're Talking About