KING COUNTY (WA): Seattle Metropolitan and Surrounding Areas

 
 
 

Group sues Secretary of State for improper voter registrations

Posted by: Michael Reitz | 10/08/2008 10:00 AM

Does the Secretary of State have an obligation to prevent improper voter registrations? The Evergreen Freedom Foundation thinks so. The group has filed a complaint against Secretary of State Sam Reed in Thurston County Superior Court, alleging the Secretary is violating his obligation to prevent ineligible voters from registering. Researchers at EFF discovered that since 2000, more than 16,000 registrations from underage voters have been accepted.

Under state law, underage voters can register if they will be 18 by the next election. An improper registration is created when an application is accepted from a person who will not attain the age of 18 before the next election. Unwilling to outright reject an underage registration, many counties have resorted to unlawfully sticking these applications in a drawer, often for months at a time.

This improper procedure has led to unnecessary and unacceptable complications that create election errors and dilute legal votes. Over the last eight years, more than 16,000 registrations have been accepted by election officials from underage teens, and dozens have received ballots and cast votes.

This case was filed originally as an administrative complaint in June 2008. An administrative law judge dismissed the complaint in August. The judge found that the Secretary of State is not responsible for preventing illegal registrations but only for removing them from the voter rolls when they are discovered. She said the Secretary of State's efforts in that area were "reasonable," and found no violation in the county auditors' practice of holding on to underage registrations until the voter is 18.

EFF requested an administrative review of the decision, which was conducted by Nixon Handy, the Secretary of State's Director of Elections. In his final decision issued on September 12, Handy upheld the majority of the administrative law judge's ruling.

Today's filing in Thurston County Superior Court is a request for judicial review of the most recent decision.

EFF legal counsel Jonathan Bechtle said, "Everyone can agree that Washington needs honest and accurate elections. This lawsuit will force Secretary Reed to perform his duty to keep the voter rolls accurate and prevent illegal votes. Our action will not disrupt the election in November, but is aimed at a long-term solution to registration problems.  All we are asking the court to do is to hold the Secretary of State's office to the same level of accountability that we expect from clerks selling alcohol in convenience stores."

Additional Information

CATEGORY: FEATURE, The Courts

Comments

Michael Kerr said:

Way to go Evergreen Freedom Foundation. Keep those bozos in line!

Joe said:

So here in Washington a conservative group has to sue a Republican Secretary of State to enforce the law? If it weren't so sad it would be comical.

Karen said:

How about John McCain agreeing to renegotiate loans at current market value. It's bad news not just in Washington but across the board. McCain is a sellout and not much different than Obama.

Brian Zylstra Author Profile Page said:

MEMO: State Elections Division response to Evergreen Freedom Foundation’s lawsuit
--------------
Washington has tightened its monitoring of potential underage voting, and election officials are confident that aggressive screening will prevent underage voting in the upcoming General Election, says state Elections Director Nick Handy. His comment came as Evergreen Freedom Foundation, an Olympia based think tank, filed suit in Thurston County Superior Court seeking review of an administrative law judge’s ruling that upheld the Secretary of State’s Office.

“We have tightened our procedures and we are monitoring the situation very aggressively,” Handy said. “We are working closely with the counties and we are confident that policies and procedures are in place to insure that underage voters are not allowed to vote.

“Our system for keeping ineligible 17 year olds from being added to the state list of voters is working very well.

“We were pleased that out of nearly 1.5 million ballots cast in the primary, we had no instances of underage voters and we don’t expect any problems in the upcoming General Election. There were no problems reported in the 2007 election and four cases of human error that allowed four 17 year olds to vote in the presidential primary this year. Since that time, we have tightened our procedures further and stepped up our monitoring.”

A statewide voter registration database launched in January, 2006, allows state election officials to spot any potential problems and to make sure that citizens who won’t be 18 before Election Day do not get a ballot. State law allows 17 year old to register, as long as they’ll turn 18 by the election, but they aren’t entered on the central database until they actually turn 18.

An independent administrative law judge, Rebekah R. Ross, dismissed an EFF complaint in August. Her written order said, “I find that the evidence does not support a finding that the Secretary of State has a policy or procedure that allows counties to register underage persons, resulting in underage voters. …The fact that there were no actual underage votes in 2007 and only four in 2008 is strong evidence that the current policies are working to prevent underage registration and voting.”
------
Nick Handy is at (360) 902-4156.

- Brian Zylstra, Deputy Communications Director, Office of Secretary of State

Michael Reitz Author Profile Page said:

Brian, the "aggressive screening" sounds good, but the Sept. 26 release of the database shows seven underage registrations for the General Election. The problem still exists and won't go away without solid enforcement at the time of registration. Screenshots of the new underage registrations here:

http://www.libertylive.org/blog_main/post.php?post_id=907

Select a Red County Blog

MEET THE LOCAL EDITOR
 
 

Recent Comments

11/15/2008 5:16 PM

Z commented about: Pictures of Fraudulent Democratic Election Letter

It may be ill advised, but it is apparently not "fraudulent" and certainly not election fraud. Forbes has...
 

11/12/2008 8:35 PM

Michael Reitz commented about: Attention bloggers, please file your lobbyist forms...

Lew, thanks for the comments. I think it's pretty easy for most folks to distinguish between paid lobbyists...
 

11/12/2008 7:28 PM

Doug commented about: Self Evident Truth: A Nation Divided

'A house divided cannot stand' if cultural opponents do not honor Law and Order. The First Amendment guarantees...
 

11/12/2008 4:28 PM

Lew McMurran commented about: Attention bloggers, please file your lobbyist forms...

Michael, thanks for posting this. As a registered lobbyist who also blogs I submitted comments that capture your...
 

11/12/2008 1:37 PM

April E. Coggins commented about: Are bloggers lobbyists?

Michael, what is the criteria for "news media?" How does one qualify as news media?...
 

11/12/2008 1:10 PM

Michael Reitz commented about: Are bloggers lobbyists?

Dana & April, the PDC has definitions for who qualifies as lobbyist. Two exceptions are citizens who are...
 

11/12/2008 1:06 PM

April E. Coggins commented about: Are bloggers lobbyists?

Dana, I'm not sure the definition of a lobbyist can be that straight forward. For example, can a...
 

11/12/2008 10:24 AM

John commented about: Are bloggers lobbyists?

Bloggers are considered lobbyists in Washington only if they are advocating for market-oriented or limited-government policies, especially policies...
 

11/11/2008 8:53 PM

Dana Callen commented about: Are bloggers lobbyists?

I do not think that citizens expressing their opinions should be considered to be lobbyists. If, however, a...
 

11/10/2008 8:10 PM

Doug commented about: No More Pity Party

Most people vote on the basis of economic self-interest, and McCain failed to win the confidence of voters...
 

11/09/2008 5:39 PM

Dave commented about: No More Pity Party

Dick Armey is wrong. He states that "Republicans lost control of Congress in 2006 because voters no longer...
 

11/08/2008 4:51 PM

maureen commented about: No More Pity Party

Angie Vogt is a tremendous writer and has served us up political meat and potatoes. It is clarity...
 

11/07/2008 12:47 AM

ARMY WIFE commented about: Barack Obama is My President

Perhaps he can now answer all the questions he had previously said were "not in his paygrade"...
 

11/06/2008 11:27 PM

J. Goldberg commented about: Highline School District Teachers Wearing Pro-Obama Paraphernalia

As a retired attorney who spend 31 years in the legal profession (8 years as a prosecuting attorney...
 

11/06/2008 11:08 PM

Melanie commented about: Barack Obama is My President

I really enjoyed your commentary. It's sad to say, but so many people (from both sides of the...
 

11/06/2008 9:19 PM

Anonymous commented about: Highline School District Teachers Wearing Pro-Obama Paraphernalia

No one has mentioned whether the specifics of RCW 29A 84.510 were actually violated. If the teacher stayed...
 

11/06/2008 4:10 PM

ANC commented about: Barack Obama is My President

Bob, Here read this from a CNN study: "Florida Supreme Court recount ruling On December 12, 2000, the...
 

11/06/2008 3:57 PM

RightThinkingWoman commented about: Barack Obama is My President

David H: You sound like one of the angry old geezers that give conservatives a bad name. Liberals...
 

11/06/2008 12:17 PM

Michael Kerr commented about: Barack Obama is My President

Angie, Outstanding! You illustrate a point in your message which reflects one of the great attributes of many...
 

11/06/2008 12:17 PM

Bob commented about: Barack Obama is My President

Tommy, While I generally like your comment I must take issue with one point. You said: "Unlike liberals...
 

What We're Talking About