Violent Clashes Mark 30 Year Anniversary of Iran Hostage Crisis

By Rep. Ed Royce | 11/04/09 | 10:12 PM EDT | 4 Comments

Latest national commentaries

more »

Thirty years ago, the U.S. Embassy in Tehran was stormed by radical Islamists. Fifty-two Americans were held for 444 days.  The regime marks this date each year with rallies, "death to America" chants and the burning of the Stars and Stripes. This year is different. The opposition "Green Movement" is rebutting those slogans with their own "death to the dictator" chants. There are violent clashes in Tehran's streets. 

At one protest, the crowd reportedly chanted, "Obama, Obama, you are either with us or with them."  The Administration's actions are speaking loudly on that question. Reportedly it has cut back programs to assist brave Iranians seeking democracy.  One Iran expert has noted that the Obama Administration views the democratic movement inside Iran "as a wrench in the works of nuclear negotiations" with the Iranian regime.  Indeed, an op-ed in today's Wall Street Journal ("The President Snubs Iran's Democrats,") states that "Iranian cyberspace is brimming with anger at what the Green Movement sees as betrayal by the West...'Engagement' it turns out, is about nuclear weapons alone - no matter how many innocent Iranians are being beaten, tortured, raped and killed for expressing their hope for change."      

Some believe that a singular focus on Iran's nuclear program is logical, given its threat to international security.  But as noted by Shirin Ebadi - an Iranian lawyer and fellow Nobel Peace prize laureate of President Obama's - a focus on the Iranian regime's militant character is just as critical to U.S. security interests.  "Imagine if the government actually promised to stop its nuclear program tomorrow.  Would you trust this government not to start another secret nuclear program somewhere else?"  Her message: engage Iran - but pay attention to the trampling of democracy and human rights (Washington Post editorial: "How to Engage Iran").  

There's no guarantee that a democratic Iran would be nuclear weapons-free, but that happy state would be far more likely in an Iran not gripped by the Supreme Council.  We know which way that's going.  With the Obama Administration's failure to speak out against the regime's abuses, its tag-line "smart diplomacy" has failed to grasp the elementary lesson that promoting democracy in Iran and improving our national security go hand-in-hand. 

 

Print | Email | Share
 

4 Comments | Related Topics »National | Orange County (CA)

 

Comments

 
The message to the Obama

The message to the Obama administration is clear; support the cause of freedom in Iran.

Submitted by Terry on Wed, 11/04/09 - 10:13 PM » | Print
 
 
The stakes are even higher

The stakes are even higher today. Iran must be dealt with. The clock is ticking.

Submitted by Sharon on Wed, 11/04/09 - 10:15 PM » | Print
 
 
Orwellian Memory Hole

Ed provides a filler piece reminding us of the horrors of a totalitarian state and our duty to support the forces of freedom. For that, Ed is to be commended.

As we are reminded of the Iranian regime's suppression of freedom, let us take care that we not fall into counter-demomacy practices. Red County needs to lead by example and not just rhetoric.

Yesterday, we saw a classic example of the Orwellian Memory Hole, a favored way of the totalitarian states' handling of embarrassing matters. 

The memory hole, as in the phrase "Going down the memory hole," is a phrase in Newspeak which refers to a small chute leading to a large incinerator used for censorship in George Orwell's novel, Nineteen Eighty-Four

Only Larry Kudlow disturbed the silence of the NY-23 election by noting Hoffman came "darn close" for an "outsider"

From wall-to-wall coverage with intra-day updates to virtual silence about NY-23 smacks of things that go on in places we fear and detest as stifling democratic freedoms.

We are better than that...

 

Submitted by Leland Reed on Thu, 11/05/09 - 09:32 AM » | Print
 
 
Carter reelection

As we all know, Carter was reelected and is in office as we speak.

Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 11/05/09 - 11:41 AM » | Print
 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.