LATEST FROM OTHER COUNTIES

Obama as Clueless as Bush on Mexico Violence

By Michelle Malkin | 03/17/10 | 11:23 AM EDT | 0 Comments

At a joint press conference with Mexican President Felipe Calderon last year, President Obama vowed to make ending border violence a "top priority." How's that hope and change working out? Drug-related crime is out of control, the State Department is warning spring-break vacationers to avoid the Mexican states of Durango, Coahuila and Chihuahua, and the bloodshed has now reached the U.S. consulate's office.

A young American consulate worker and her unborn baby were slain this weekend in Mexico, along with her U.S. detention officer husband and the Mexican husband of another consulate worker. The wanton murders appear to have been a coordinated drug cartel hit; the victims had all just left a children's birthday party in Juarez and were headed across the border back into Texas. The pregnant American official, Lesley Enriquez, is reportedly the first consulate employee to die in drug-related violence since 1985. Her 7-month-old daughter, terrorized by the gunfire while strapped in her car seat, was the lone survivor of the attack.

The State Department has now authorized the evacuation of dependents of U.S. personnel in six Mexican cities along its northern border with the U.S. And the resort town of Acapulco saw at least 13 murdered over the past week -- including four beheadings. The total death toll over the past three years is nearing 20,000.

Mexican government officials have been quite content to blame their neighbors for the outbreaks; to play the race card; to demand blanket amnesty for illegal aliens from their country trying to flee the violence and misery; and to collect massive infusions of U.S. aid that have fallen into the wrong hands. The question for this White House is: How many more Americans will be targeted for execution before we stop rewarding such fatally arrogant behavior?

Reminder: With bipartisan support, the Bush administration handed over $1.6 billion to help Mexico control its border chaos in 2008. The crime-fighting package known as the "Merida Initiative" funded helicopters, surveillance equipment, computer infrastructure, the expansion of intelligence databases, anti-corruption initiatives, human rights education and training, and an anti-money laundering program for our southern neighbors.

President Obama accelerated the release of Merida Initiative cash to Mexico and tossed even more taxpayer funding into the mix. All of this while our own measly border enforcement initiatives have been shortchanged, demagogued or completely abandoned.

Critics of the Merida Initiative (including yours truly) warned that lax oversight would lead to inevitable plundering of the money by corrupt Mexican government officials and more unabated bloodshed. Calderon cried "racist!" and demanded that the aid be forked over with no strings attached: "Give it to me. And give it to me without conditions," he told Congress.

Well, who's watching over the program now? Who's measuring its success or failure? Judging from the endless pile of corpses and horrific headlines, the Merida Initiative has turned out to be a boon and a boondoggle for the Mexican thugocracy. The civilian police force is notoriously under the thumb of the drug networks across the country. Infiltrators have penetrated at all levels.

The Brookings Institution warned two years ago: "Multiple Federal agencies have earned a reputation for ineffectiveness and corruption; among them, the Attorney General's Federal Investigative Agency, the Ministry of Public Security's Federal Preventive Police Force, the Ministry of Government's Center for Investigation and National Security and the Ministry of Finance's Customs Administration. … State security agencies and the courts have not protected the citizenry effectively. According to surveys carried out by Transparencia Mexicana, the police and justice system are perceived as having worse problems of corruption and inefficiency than other public agencies."

Yet, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says the lesson of this weekend's killing spree is that the U.S. needs to work even closer with the Calderon administration -- and at least one House Democrat in Texas, Henry Cuellar, is calling for a second Merida Initiative package. This is a recipe for an even bloodier Mexican Drug Cartel Stimulus Package.

If you subsidize it, you'll get more of it. Loco.


Print | Email | Share
 

0 Comments | Related Topics »National | CALIFORNIA | NEW MEXICO | TEXAS

Texas Primary Post-Mortem, Part One

By Michele Samuelson | 03/03/10 | 1:09 PM EDT | 0 Comments

Before I start this, let's all take a moment and revel in the outright defeat of liberal stalwart "Republican" Tommy Merritt in HD 7. Goodbye, O Caucus of One. We knew ye too well. This blogger offers hearty congratulations and welcome to conservative David Simpson.

I'm also very saddened by Railroad Commissioner Victor Carrillo's loss. Chairman Carrillo has had some health problems in recent months, and we'll be praying for him.
 
Okay, now, the rest of it. There are runoffs a-plenty, including one right here in Travis County (HD 47 - Holly Turner and Paul Workman) and another over the road in Williamson County (HD 52 - Larry Gonzalez and John Gordon). Other biggies include both races in Lubbock (Delwin Jones vs Charles Perry, and Mark Griffin vs John Frullo in the race to replace Carl Isett). The runoff date is April 13. All the vitriol you thought you were going to have to deal with from a gubernatorial runoff will show itself brightly now in down-ballot contests, so we're not safe until April 14 at the earliest. Oh, and, I am endorsing Larry Gonzalez, Charles Perry, and John Frullo. (maintaining neutrality in HD 47 - though, I hope we hear a lot more in the future from third-place candidate David Sewell, an attorney with extensive knowledge of the franchise tax)
 
In the out-right wins, there was a surprise in HD 20, where Dr. Charles Schwertner beat out a four-way field with over 11,000 votes (the second-place candidate, Milton Rister, got just 4,678 votes - he had been the favorite, but Schwertner outspent him).
 
State Rep. Vicki Truitt will be back, though it's less likely that she'll come back swinging for tax hikes. Remember this picture of her with tax-and-spend Democrats Kirk Watson, Mike Villareal, and Wendy Davis and others at the first-ever tax hike rally at the Capitol last May? Might be a good idea if she stays far away from those legislators for awhile.
 
State Rep. Todd Smith will also be back, and I've got some ideas for how he could vindicate himself for killing voter i.d. last session (incidentally, more than 90% of Republican primary voters statewide want this addressed - Chairman Smith, I hope you'll listen to us "stupid" Republicans). There should be a state law that election judges picking up materials must show photo identification, and again when they drop them off. Criminal background checks on all temporary election hires, including all election judges and alternates, would also be a great idea.
 
Lots of other races to talk about - how about those SBOE primaries? - but I'll do this in piecemeal (mostly because, it's still a busy time for us party hack types! SD/county conventions on March 20!!).
 
 
 
 


Print | Email | Share
 
Texas Educrat PAC mixing it up in SBOE race

By Michele Samuelson | 01/28/10 | 9:32 PM EDT | 0 Comments

(cross-posted at Blue Dot Blues)

Oy vay. We don't have enough problems in these SBOE races? The nefarious Texas EducratParent PAC has endorsed Thomas Ratliff in the SBOE 9 Republican primary (where Don McLeroy is the incumbent).

 
I've written about Parent PAC's involvement in Texas elections since 2006, so if you're interested in the history, check out the tag at Blue Dot Blues. According to the Quorum Report story (subscribers only) on the Ratliff endorsement, the PAC decided to get involved at the SBOE level because that's apparently where education decisions are made (who would've thought?). A simplified way of saying it, perhaps - but the PAC spent the 2006 and 2008 election seasons swatting at voucher proponents in the Legislature, and now they're revealing a much deeper agenda than some of us had heretofore suspected and not verified. They'd like to get rid of conservatives on the SBOE, and go for people who want electronic textbooks and more education spending, for instance. Their Texas Ethics Commission reports bear this out again and again.
 
Just in case you're curious about who gives to Parent PAC, I scour the TEC reports so you don't have to. Here's a list from the latest report, just people who caught my eye:
 
January Semi-Annual:
Clifford Brown (goes by "Buster" - mayor of Corsicana, lots of cash to Democrats), $1000, 11/25/2009
Elna Christopher (Texas Association of Counties, Director of Media Relations), $100, 11/27/2009
Patricia Conradt (Chief of Staff for Rep. Joe Heflin, D-Crosbyton), $100, 12/1/2009
Sandy Dochen (Public relations), $100, 11/16/2009
Laura Fowler (Lawyer), $100, 10/10/2009
Susan Griffith (Realtor), $100, 11/17/2009
Eliu M. Hinojosa (Superintendent, Dallas ISD), $100, 12/15/2009
Shanna Igo (Texas Municipal League, Director of Legislative Services), $500, 11/17/2009
Dr. Melody Johnson (Superintendent, Fort Worth ISD), $250, 12/26/2009
Sandra Kibby (Wholesale Beverage Distributor), $100, 11/24/2009
Sara Leon (Lawyer), $100, 10/10/2009
Sherrie Matula (Educational Science Consultant and former Democrat candidate for state rep), $250, 10/3/2009
Ken McCraw (Executive Director, Texas Association of Community Schools), $250, 11/12/2009
Pam(e) Noland (District Services Coordinator, New Deal ISD), $100, 10/10/2009
Blake Powell (Lawyer), $100, 10/10/2009
Pat Pringle (Executive Director, Region XIII Education Svc. Center), $100, 12/1/2009
Gwendolyn Santiago (Executive Director, Texas Association of School Business Officials), $100, 12/23/2009
Guy Sconzo (Superintendent, Humble ISD), $100, 12/1/2009
Dr. Henry Scott (Superintendent, Denison ISD), $75, 12/1/2009
Gene Sheets (Superintendent, Muleshoe ISD), $100, 10/6/2009
 
 
Wow. That's a good chunk of the contributors on the January semi-annual. I left off a couple of retirees and one or two homemakers.
 
What is the agenda, again, exactly? Supporting what parents want, or what school administrators want?
 


Print | Email | Share
 
SCOTUS knocks big hole in McCain-Feingold

By Michele Samuelson | 01/21/10 | 11:54 AM EDT | 0 Comments

Big news this morning, courtesy of The Hill's Aaron Blake. A decision has been made in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
 

The court upheld disclosure requirements for corporations but struck down the distinction between individual expenditures and corporate ones. That should allow corporations to spend freely in support or opposition to candidates.

"No sufficient governmental interest justifies limits on the political speech of nonprofit or for-profit corporations," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the 5-4 decision, led by the court's conservative wing.

The case is a potential gatecrasher for the amount of money in politics, and experts were immediately casting the ruling as a big change in campaign finance law.

The entire opinion can be found here.

Another quote from Justice Kennedy, found in the Miami Herald: "The government may regulate corporate political speech through disclaimer and disclosure requirements, but it may not suppress that speech altogether."

ScotusBlog has a liveblog of today's opinions going and they've chimed in on Citizens United. Check that out here.

Hot Air's Ed Morrissey has a bunch of background.

My two cents: it's not fabulous that labor unions can give campaigns money - but it's constitutionally on the level. After all, when you shine a light on the dark places, the rats usually scatter. Keep it legal, keep it transparent.


Print | Email | Share
 
Republican momentum reflected in bluest Texas county

By Michele Samuelson | 01/07/10 | 3:08 PM EDT | 0 Comments

East Austin was home to a historically unusual event this morning: a gathering of Republican precinct chairmen and supporters, and more than a dozen Republican candidates. Today's press conference at the Travis County Republican Party headquarters on Cameron Road was well attended, and the press got their first look at the strength of the local Republican slate in 2010.

From the press release:
 

"There are 16 Republican candidates who will be competing for offices in Travis county-wide races. There are 8 more candidates for positions that include parts of Travis County and extend outside its boundaries. Along with the 22 state-wide races and 7 federal races where Republicans vie for positions, voters in this county will have to make choices among some 53 Republicans on the ballot in Travis County."

And from Chairman Edwards:

"The candidates on the Republican slate are representative of the best that Travis County has to offer: A clear choice of common sense leadership, integrity and focus on our fellow citizens of Austin who want to keep jobs if you have them, find jobs if you've lost yours and provide for your family for them to be prosperous."

A full copy of the press release can be viewed here.


Print | Email | Share
 
DCCC candidate McDonald decides not to run in TX-10

By Michele Samuelson | 12/22/09 | 4:50 PM EDT | 0 Comments

One of the most heavily targeted Congressional districts in the country for 2010 is the Texas 10th, currently held by Republican Rep. Michael McCaul.  Since February, McCaul has been gearing up for a fight against Democrat businessman Jack McDonald.  Today, after a long and arduous exploratory campaign in which McDonald gave McCaul plenty of reason to sweat, McDonald made public his decision to back out of the race.

So.  Jack McDonald is NOT filing to run against Michael McCaul.  McCaul does have a primary challenger in Travis County resident Joe Petronis.  But neither of them will face off against the well-funded McDonald next November.

 


Print | Email | Share