Response from Senator Dutton on Prop 1 A
By Jessica Austin | 03/12/09 | 03:38 PM EDT | 2 Comments
As I am sure many people are aware-- John and Ken are on the air live right now discussing Red County San Bernardino and Assemblyman Cook's editorial below. Â
Here is the response I just received from the Senator as a response to the current drama surrounding Prop 1A and the GOP:
I voted against putting Prop 1A on the ballot for a number of reasons.Â
While the language in Prop. 1A does not specially say it will raise taxes, approving the measure will cost taxpayers an additional $16 billion, according to the non-partisan Legislative Analyst Office.Â
These taxes include extending the sales tax, nearly doubling the car tax, an increase in the personal income tax rate and a reduction in the tax credit for dependents, costing California families $200 per child.
All totaled, these tax increases on Prop 1A will cost the typical California family more than $1,000 a year.
That's hardly an honest spending cap.
In exchange for billions in new taxes you get a spending cap that limits spending until they raise taxes again. That's right, every time taxes are raised, the so-called spending cap can be adjusted upward. Where's the spending discipline in that?
This spending cap won't work and if Prop 1A is approved, voters will pay $16 billion more in taxes and California will continue to face budget deficits far into the future.
The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association opposes this measure and so should you.
2 Comments | Related Topics »
RECOMMENDED SITES















Comments
Dutton did not stop Adams from voting on this measure (as was his duty as a republican), in fact he agreed to Endorse Adams for his re-election and to raise money for him. To me that makes him Complicit since he signed the no new taxes pledge and allowed a fellow republican to vote for it with his support.
- reply
|Dutton did not stop Adams from voting on this measure (as was his duty as a republican), in fact he agreed to Endorse Adams for his re-election and to raise money for him. To me that makes him Complicit since he signed the no new taxes pledge and allowed a fellow republican to vote for it with his support.
- reply
|Post new comment