Where is Bill Postmus?
Posted by: SB Pietas | 10/09/2008 10:31 AM
That is a question that is starting to be asked by both the media and the public. A year and a half after then-Supervisor Bill Postmus entered a countywide office, he has all but abandoned his duties as county assessor. Originally elected by the public to remove "the last of the corrupt county officials" (referring to incumbent Don Williamson), Bill Postmus has embarrassed San Bernardino County not so much by action as by inaction.
The story of Bill Postmus' assessorship is not centered on personal abuses of power, but rather on allowing others to abuse their power. Postmus comes off as, above all, impotent, with a notable lack of leadership. Postmus' problem is not a problem of bad decisions. More often than not, it is a problem of no decision. This has been certainly been seen in the political aspects of his political elected office. One need only consider Postmus' refusal to fire Adam Aleman, instead allowing him to resign, his refusal to appear before the Board of Supervisors, as requested by that body, his refusal to either refute the charges of drug abuse or to immediately resign, and his refusal to return to work following a publicized ten week "medical" leave of absence.
Not only that, Bill Postmus has shown a lack of leadership when it comes to the professional duties of his office. How active a roll has Bill Postmus played in setting the policy of the assessor's office? Sure, he has taken credit for Proposition 8, but Revenue and Taxation Code basically requires it be implemented regardless of the assessor's wishes. What else has Postmus done? Having no property taxation background, Postmus is simply not qualified to serve as county assessor.
Click "Read More" to read more.
True, it may be important for an outsider to hold the office, to serve as an elected "check" on the bureaucracy. But Postmus has not embraced this roll. In fact, he has more often than not simply chosen to let the office run as it will. The County of San Bernardino should be thankful that the permanent appraisal and assessment staff is as qualified and responsible as it is, considering that Bill Postmus clearly lacks the necessary skills to affect any meaningful change in his office, if such change were necessary.
Bill Postmus, at least since taking office as assessor, can best be described as just plain apathetic.
Shortly after the release of the San Bernardino Grand Jury's annual report, the Board of Supervisors requested that Postmus appear before them, to address the charges in that report. The Board requested that Postmus appear not the following week, but the following month--they seemed eager to not give Postmus any excuses for "scheduling" reasons.
Still, to avoid having to go, Postmus opted to take a medical leave of absence, which gave him cover not to appear.
His medical leave of absence was publicized to be ten weeks in length. It began on July 24, and therefore should have ended on October 2. Postmus has still not returned to work.
I started this post with a question: "Where is Bill Postmus?" While I do mean it specifically--Why isn't he at work; his 10 weeks are up--I also mean it generally. What we have seen in the past few years has not been the Bill Postmus that was elected County Supervisor in 2000, full of energy, youth, and excitement. This is not the Bill Postmus who racked up accomplishments during his time on the Board, who made the County GOP a powerful entity, who fought a campaign to remove corruption and protect taxpayers. This is not the Bill Postmus we voted for.
If that Bill Postmus is gone, the one we have should go as well. As taxpayers, as voters, as citizens, we're not getting our money's worth with this assessor. If Bill Postmus cannot regain the energy and enthusiasm to execute his office in a way that makes the taxpayers proud, he should simply resign.
Write SB Pietas at sbpietas@yahoo.com.
The story of Bill Postmus' assessorship is not centered on personal abuses of power, but rather on allowing others to abuse their power. Postmus comes off as, above all, impotent, with a notable lack of leadership. Postmus' problem is not a problem of bad decisions. More often than not, it is a problem of no decision. This has been certainly been seen in the political aspects of his political elected office. One need only consider Postmus' refusal to fire Adam Aleman, instead allowing him to resign, his refusal to appear before the Board of Supervisors, as requested by that body, his refusal to either refute the charges of drug abuse or to immediately resign, and his refusal to return to work following a publicized ten week "medical" leave of absence.
Not only that, Bill Postmus has shown a lack of leadership when it comes to the professional duties of his office. How active a roll has Bill Postmus played in setting the policy of the assessor's office? Sure, he has taken credit for Proposition 8, but Revenue and Taxation Code basically requires it be implemented regardless of the assessor's wishes. What else has Postmus done? Having no property taxation background, Postmus is simply not qualified to serve as county assessor.
Click "Read More" to read more.
True, it may be important for an outsider to hold the office, to serve as an elected "check" on the bureaucracy. But Postmus has not embraced this roll. In fact, he has more often than not simply chosen to let the office run as it will. The County of San Bernardino should be thankful that the permanent appraisal and assessment staff is as qualified and responsible as it is, considering that Bill Postmus clearly lacks the necessary skills to affect any meaningful change in his office, if such change were necessary.
Bill Postmus, at least since taking office as assessor, can best be described as just plain apathetic.
Shortly after the release of the San Bernardino Grand Jury's annual report, the Board of Supervisors requested that Postmus appear before them, to address the charges in that report. The Board requested that Postmus appear not the following week, but the following month--they seemed eager to not give Postmus any excuses for "scheduling" reasons.
Still, to avoid having to go, Postmus opted to take a medical leave of absence, which gave him cover not to appear.
His medical leave of absence was publicized to be ten weeks in length. It began on July 24, and therefore should have ended on October 2. Postmus has still not returned to work.
I started this post with a question: "Where is Bill Postmus?" While I do mean it specifically--Why isn't he at work; his 10 weeks are up--I also mean it generally. What we have seen in the past few years has not been the Bill Postmus that was elected County Supervisor in 2000, full of energy, youth, and excitement. This is not the Bill Postmus who racked up accomplishments during his time on the Board, who made the County GOP a powerful entity, who fought a campaign to remove corruption and protect taxpayers. This is not the Bill Postmus we voted for.
If that Bill Postmus is gone, the one we have should go as well. As taxpayers, as voters, as citizens, we're not getting our money's worth with this assessor. If Bill Postmus cannot regain the energy and enthusiasm to execute his office in a way that makes the taxpayers proud, he should simply resign.
Write SB Pietas at sbpietas@yahoo.com.
CATEGORY:
Blogger Editorials, Local SB Issues
This is why many sports ban the use of performance enhancing drugs. Another form of doping is blood...
We'll have better luck trying to point out Waldo from a picture of millions of objects than ever concluding where Bill is.
The more important question is why aren't those in charge holding him accountable?
That's the problem. Bill Postmus doesn't really report to anyone. The Board of Supervisors can remove him, but that process is lengthy and expensive. By the time he would be removed, there's a good chance he'd be out of office anyway. A recall has similar issues.
The only practical way for Postmus to leave office before his term expires is by resignation--by choice or not. If the DA or the Board has something criminal on Postmus, they may be able to use that as leverage to convince him to resign. Short of that, or Bill choosing to move on with his life, Bill will likely remain assessor.
SB Pietas ~ You're right, although Bill's continuing absence is not excusable, he was fortunate to have life-long bureaucrats step up to the plate and continue the office's mission. Although I admire their ability to get the job done, I'm afraid the taxpayers will be paying the price in the long run.
We, in the taxpayers' community, were hoping (and praying) that Bill would provide some balance to the allegedly pro-revenue civil servants that Williamson placed in key roles around the office. Unfortunately, Bill's personal problems have left a void at the top and now those civil servants are the ones left running the show. While most of the staff tries to get it right, a few bad apples choose to defend the assessment roll--right or wrong--and they use every procedural rule in the book they can in the process. Without elected leadership, those civil servants are now accountable to no one. It's sad. MN