<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Red County</title>
        <link>http://www.redcounty.com/</link>
        <description>Grassroots Politics from the Center-Right</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Ex-Governor Wilson Seeks to Spare Judges from Politics</title>
            <description>
From Capitol WeeklyFormer Gov. Pete Wilson believes the California state constitution should be amended to both spare judicial candidates from responding to political groups&apos; candidate questionnaires and urge would-be judges to keep their legal views out of politics.Wilson&apos;s novel proposal for a ballot measure &quot;to depoliticize the administration of justice in our state courts&quot; stirred the conversation today at a Sacramento forum for Judicial Council of California.The group&apos;s Commission for Impartial Courts is examining whether political contributions and an increasing campaign role by advocacy groups can undermine an independent judiciary. The issue has been ignited by a proliferation of attack

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/07/exgovernor-wilson-seeks-to-spa/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/07/exgovernor-wilson-seeks-to-spa/</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">constitutional amendment</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Governor Wilson</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">judges</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">politics</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:57:09 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Take No Prisioners</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[The following is an article written by California Republican Lawyers Association and Riverside attorney Richard Brent Reed that appeared in yesterday's Los Angeles Daily Journal.&nbsp; Happy 4th of July!&nbsp;"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."&nbsp; --&nbsp; U. S. Constitution, Article I, Section 9 (2)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (The Suspension Clause)&nbsp;Following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, U. S. armed forces invaded Afghanistan to snuff out al Qaeda along with the Taliban government that nurtured that terrorist organization.&nbsp; The Department of Defense set up]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/07/take-no-prisioners/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/07/take-no-prisioners/</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FEATURE</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">California Republican Lawyers Association</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">habeas corpus</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Los Angeles Daily Journal</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Richard Reed</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Supreme Court</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:28:57 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>High Court Affirms Individual Right to Bear Arms</title>
            <description>
The second amendment to the Constitution reads:&quot;A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.&quot;The pro-gun lobby and the pro-gun &apos;restriction&apos; lobby have debated for years who this sentence refers to: the military, private citizens or both? Today, the Supreme Court decided by a five to four vote that the right &quot;to bear arms&quot; is an individual right. In the majority was Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Scalia, Justice Thomas, Justice Alito and Justice Kennedy. Specifically, the court held: &quot;The Second Amendment protects

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/06/high-court-affirms-individual/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/06/high-court-affirms-individual/</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:40:17 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Judicial Activism: An Abuse of Power</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[Last month, Senator John McCain gave a speech delineating his judicial philosophy.&nbsp; In that speech, the presidential hopeful addressed the evils of judicial activism, stating that "every federal court should be a refuge from abuses of power, and not the source." It's the best speech I'd ever heard him give.Judicial activism is when courts go beyond mere interpretation of law, and instead create law, substituting their own political opinions for the elected legislature.&nbsp; The most recent example of this abuse right here in California. I agree with the Senator that judicial activism, in all its forms, must be curbed. Activism]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/06/judicial-activism-an-abuse-of/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/06/judicial-activism-an-abuse-of/</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">judicial activism</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">judicial restraint</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Senator McCain</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:08:16 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>California Republican Lawyers Association Endorsed Candidates Win in Riverside County</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[ John Molloy and Michael Rushton were both endorsed by the California Republican Lawyers Association&nbsp;for Riverside County Superior Court Judge.Running to fill the vacancy created when Judge Robert Spitzer was removed&nbsp;for misconduct, John Molloy easily beat&nbsp; opponents Anne Knighten and John Vinyard.&nbsp; Molloy won 52 percent of the vote.Michael Rushton ran unopposed and will fill the vacancy left by Judge Thompson Hanks, who is retiring.Both Molloy and Rushton are veteran prosecutors with the Riverside County District Attorney's Office.&nbsp;]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/06/california-republican-lawyers-2/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/06/california-republican-lawyers-2/</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John Molloy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Michael Rushton.</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Republican Party of Riverside County</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County Courts</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County D.A. Rod Pacheco</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County District Attorney</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:32:58 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Secretary Bowen Qualifies Initiative to Define Marriage in California</title>
            <description>
Regardless of your individual views on the issue of gay marriage, the California Supreme Court widely overstepped their constitutional grant of authority in substituting their will for the will of the people. In an effort to correct this naked act of judicial legislation, and prevent it from happening again with respect to this issue, California Family Council has fought back with an initiative that will define marriage in California once and for all as between a man and a woman.Below are details from the Christian Newswire:California Marriage Amendment Qualifies for November Ballot - The People Will DecideSACRAMENTO, June 2 /Christian

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/06/secretary-bowen-qualifies-init/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/06/secretary-bowen-qualifies-init/</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FEATURE</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">constitutional law</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">gay marriage</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">initiative</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">marriage</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:54:36 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>California Republican Lawyers Release State Wide Voter Guide On Judges</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[ As Secretary of the California Republican Party and President of the California Republican Lawyers Association, I have traveled throughout California speaking to Republican organizations regarding the power of Judges.&nbsp; I usually start the discussion by asking the following question:"What branch of government do you believe is the most powerful - the legislative, the executive or the judicial?" I have been amazed by the fact that every group responds that the most powerful branch of government is the judiciary.&nbsp; Therefore, it seems ironic to me that we spend so little time and resources on judicial elections.&nbsp; Millions are spent every]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/california-republican-lawyers-1/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/california-republican-lawyers-1/</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 21:52:08 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The CA Supreme Court&apos;s Mandate of Homosexual Marriage - What Will You Do Now?</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[ As you know by now, the California Supreme Court ruled that Proposition 22 (passed in 2000 by over 61% of the voters) is unconstitutional and it ordered that the State of California must allow homosexual couples to marry.&nbsp; Four members of the seven-member court have now imposed their will upon all Californians.While it is tempting to ring our hands at the sad state of affairs, the real question is "What will you do now?"&nbsp; There are concrete steps that can and need to be taken to reverse this activist court's decision. Before I lay out those concrete steps, let]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/the-cal-supreme-courts-mandate/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/the-cal-supreme-courts-mandate/</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FEATURE</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">California Supreme Court</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">gay marriage</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Homosexual marriage</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">initiative campaign</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">petition drive</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Prop. 22</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Protectmarriage.com</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">saveourkids.net</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">SB 777</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:49:21 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Profile: Mike Bartlett for Judge</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[Mike Bartlett finally responded to my questions yesterday, hence we are now moving back to the Superior Court Judge, Office No. 4 race between he and Nick Thompson.Michael Bartlett is a business attorney from Dana Point.&nbsp; Bartlett has received numerous endorsements from political heavyweights in South County like Congressman John Campbell, Senator Tom Harman and Assemblywoman Mimi Walters.As of the March 17 financial report, Bartlett has raised $41,703 and loaned his campaign $50,250.&nbsp; He already spent $39,875 on signs, filling fee and candidate statement.&nbsp; His cash on hand is $39,127.The Michael Bartlett campaign is managed by Scott Hart.&nbsp; Scott is]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/profile-mike-bartlett-for-judg/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/profile-mike-bartlett-for-judg/</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FEATURE</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mike Bartlett</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 10:24:12 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>More Political Correctness from Sacramento</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[It seems with all of the serious budget problems faced by our state government our legislators can still find time to place more burdens on those who provide services to us with politically correct nonsense.&nbsp; SB 1729 (Migden)&nbsp;is another example that our state legislators should only be allowed to meet part time lest they get into too much mischief.&nbsp; &nbsp; SB 1729, if passed into law, would provide that health care professionals must take mandatory sensitivity&nbsp;training&nbsp;if&nbsp;they provide services to "gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender" seniors.&nbsp; As with most of these pro-homosexual bills, there are no exemptions for those with any]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/more-political-correctness-fro/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/more-political-correctness-fro/</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Gay</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">health care</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Political Correctness</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">SB 1729</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Senator Carol Migden</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Seniors</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:20:45 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>More Nanny Government from Sacramento - the Anti-Spanking Bill</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[Last year Assemblywoman Sally Lieber introduced her anti-spanking bill which would have made the spanking of a child by a parent or guardian a criminal offense. Thankfully that bill was shelved by the Assembly.Not wishing to take no for an answer, Ms. Lieber is back with another version of the anti-spanking bill AB 2943. Just like last year's bill, AB 2943 wishes to make a crime out of a time honored discipline method calling for the arrest of parents who use a "switch" and causes the child "unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering." &nbsp; No one wishes to justify child]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/more-nanny-government-from-sac/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/more-nanny-government-from-sac/</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Anti-Spanking Bill</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Nanny Government</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Sally Lieber</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 09:53:36 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Profile: Nick Thompson for Judge</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[Now that we are finished with No. 12, let's shift the focus to the next judicial race - Superior Court Judge, Office No. 4.This race will be between Nick Thompson, a decorated soldier, and Michael Bartlett, a litigator.Currently working as a deputy district attorney, Thompson has earned the endorsement of his boss - T-Rack and the incumbent judge who is retiring at the end of his term.Unlike our coverage of Office No. 12, there is more firework in the competition between Nick Thompson and his opponent, which is good.&nbsp; Thompson also challenged his opponent's candidate statement on the ground of]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/profile-nick-thompson-for-judg/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/profile-nick-thompson-for-judg/</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FEATURE</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Nick Thompson</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:47:18 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Profile: Debra Carrillo for Judge</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[Next up in our coverage of the race for Superior Court Judge, Office No. 12 is Debra Carrillo.&nbsp; Ms. Carrillo has a long history of working in the legal community.&nbsp; At a much younger age, Debra was also a police officer for the City of Laguna Beach.As of the March 17 financial report, Debra raised $5,350 and loaned her campaign $50,099.&nbsp; By far this is the largest personal loan for a candidate in this race.&nbsp; Like all of her opponents, Debra spent $23,562 with the bulk of the expenditures going to the Registrar of Voters' Office for filing fee and]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/profile-debra-carrillo-for-jud/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/profile-debra-carrillo-for-jud/</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FEATURE</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Debra Carrillo</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:47:27 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Profile: KC Jones for Judge</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[The second candidate running for judge that got back to me was KC Jones, a judicial attorney for the County of Orange who is running for Superior Court Judge, Office No. 12.According to the Registrar of Voters' website, KC will be on the top of the ballot and will surely pick up support from voters who usually vote for the top candidate if they are unfamiliar with the rest.As of the March 17 report, KC only raised $2,519 but loaned his campaign $35,000, which is a sizable amount.&nbsp; He already spent $28,453 on the ballot statement and other miscellaneous items,]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/profile-kc-jones-for-judge/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/profile-kc-jones-for-judge/</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FEATURE</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">KC Jones</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:20:53 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Profile: Mike Flory for Judge</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[As the Registrar of Voters' Office is mailing out the first wave of ballots to permanent absentee voters across the county today, many of us still do not know very much about the candidates running for Orange County Superior Court Judge in Office Number: 4, 8 and 12.So to be more informed about who to vote for, I decided to contact those judicial candidates myself and the first person that responded was Michael Flory.Michael Flory, a deputy district attorney, is running for Superior Court Judge, Office No. 12.&nbsp;&nbsp; Flory is running against three other candidates.&nbsp; As of March 17, Flory]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/profile-mike-flory-for-judge/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/05/profile-mike-flory-for-judge/</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FEATURE</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mike Flory</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 13:38:48 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Supreme Court Upholds Voter ID Act</title>
            <description>
The high court has given states the green light to pass laws requiring voters to produce photo identification as a requirement to cast a ballot today. See details in the AP story below.By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press Writer, 4/28/08States can require voters to produce photo identification, the Supreme Court ruled Monday, upholding a Republican-inspired law that Democrats say will keep some poor, older and minority voters from casting ballots.Twenty-five states require some form of ID, and the court&apos;s 6-3 decision rejecting a challenge to Indiana&apos;s strict voter ID law could encourage others to adopt their own measures. Oklahoma legislators said

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/04/supreme-court-upholds-voter-id/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/04/supreme-court-upholds-voter-id/</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Supreme Court</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">voter ID Act</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:13:28 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Keeping the Judiciary in Check</title>
            <description>
Written by Chris ArledgeThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Baze v. Rees, a case challenging the State of Kentucky&apos;s lethal-injection protocol. The Court&apos;s actual decision is of limited importance, and is unlikely to take its place in the pantheon of historic rulings. In essence, seven of the nine justices concluded that Kentucky is free to continue using the same three-drug blend that it and just about every other state uses when executing prisoners. This ruling will not send shock waves through the legal world.But the case is important for a different reason: the frankness with which Justice John Paul

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/04/keeping-the-judiciary-in-check/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/04/keeping-the-judiciary-in-check/</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FEATURE</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John Paul Stevens</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Supreme Court</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:32:05 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Court to Reconsider Home-School Ruling</title>
            <description>
By: Dana HullMercury NewsA state appeals court will reconsider last month&apos;s controversial decision that said parents who home-school their children must have a teaching credential.The 2nd District Court of Appeal in Los Angeles granted a rehearing Tuesday, essentially voiding the 3-0 decision until it rules again. The decision will now allow home-schooling organizations that had blasted the decision to weigh in.&quot;Wow!&quot; said Diane Flynn Keith of Redwood City, who edits Homefires, an online home-schooling journal. &quot;I think the judge recognized that he hadn&apos;t done his homework.&quot;The case centered on a Southern California couple, Phillip and Mary Long of Lynwood, who

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/court-to-reconsider-homeschool/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/court-to-reconsider-homeschool/</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">home-schooling</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">reconsider</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">state appeals court</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:58:57 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>End of the Line for Judge Removed by State Commission</title>
            <description>
This leaves Riverside County Deputy District Attorney John Molloy as the only legitimate candidate going forward...By RICHARD K. DE ATLEYThe Press-EnterpriseRobert G. Spitzer, whose bid was turned down Wednesday for review of his dismissal from the Riverside County Superior Court, has submitted a letter to county vote officials asking for his name to be removed from the June 3 ballot.Spitzer, 59, was removed from office last October by the state Commission on Judicial Performance for willful misconduct and dishonesty. The judge appealed, saying the commission failed to look at mitigating circumstances.While he could not act as a judge, Spitzer&apos;s removal

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/end-of-the-line-for-judge-remo/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/end-of-the-line-for-judge-remo/</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:36:51 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Riverside County Judge Ousted from Bench Runs Out of Appeals</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[With Judge Spitzer out of the way, Riverside County Deputy District Attorney John Molloy is the clear frontrunner.&nbsp; The other candidates will stay on the ballot, but Mr. Molloy is the only candidate with any campaign to speak of.By RICHARD K. DE ATLEYThe Press-EnterpriseThe state Supreme Court on Wednesday turned down Robert G. Spitzer's bid to review his removal from the Riverside County Superior Court bench. The decision apparently ends his 18-year career as a judge.The state high court decision also throws into question how Spitzer can remain on the June 3 county election ballot, where he qualified to run]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/riverside-county-judge-ousted/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/riverside-county-judge-ousted/</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John Molloy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Republican Party of Riverside County</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County District Attorney</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Rod Pacheco</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:09:20 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>State Supreme Court turns down former judge&apos;s bid to return</title>
            <description>
By RICHARD K. DE ATLEYThe Press-EnterpriseThe state Supreme Court today turned down Robert G. Spitzer&apos;s bid for review of his removal from his Riverside County Superior Court bench last year.The decision this afternoon appears to have ended Spitzer&apos;s career as a judge and throws into question his place on the June 3 ballot, where he qualified to run for his old judicial office.Reached by phone, Spitzer had no comment.The state Commission on Judicial Performance removed Spitzer from his bench last October, citing willful misconduct and dishonesty.Spitzer could not act as a judge after the commission&apos;s removal, but the decision was

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/state-supreme-court-turns-down/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/state-supreme-court-turns-down/</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John Molloy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County Courts</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County D.A. Rod Pacheco</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County Republican Party</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:07:23 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Opponent Wants Judicial Candidate off Riverside County Ballot</title>
            <description>
By RICHARD K. DE ATLEYThe Press-EnterpriseA Riverside County judge removed from the bench by a state commission should also be removed from the June 3 ballot and barred from seeking re-election, an opposing candidate says in a lawsuit.Deputy District Attorney John Molloy claims that Robert G. Spitzer, ordered off the bench in October by the state Commission on Judicial Performance for willful misconduct and dishonesty, is unqualified to be a judge.The lawsuit names as defendants Riverside County Registrar Barbara Dunmore as well as Spitzer, who filed earlier this year for re-election to his old office and has qualified for the

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/opponent-wants-judicial-candid/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/opponent-wants-judicial-candid/</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John Molloy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Republican Party of Riverside County</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County D.A. Rod Pacheco</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Robert Spitzer.</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:59:22 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Senator Denham Recall to be Certified Today</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[Monterey County just reported to the Secretary of State's Office that the recall of Senator Jeff Denham in Senate District 12 is expected to be certified this afternoon.&nbsp; It will most likely be consolidated into the June Primary Election.]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/senator-denham-recall-to-be-ce/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/senator-denham-recall-to-be-ce/</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:23:09 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>U.S.S.C. Upholds Washington State Primary on 7 to 2 Vote</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[The State of Washington created a new primary system following a United States Federal Court decision that held their 70 year blanket primary was unconstitutional. Under the new primary system, upheld by the United States Supreme Court today on a 7 - 2 vote, the top two vote gathering candidates, regardless of party affiliation, advance to the general election.&nbsp; Candidates may individually choose which party they wish to be designated as on a ballot, without ever having to get the party's blessing. This means a candidate who does not represent the ideas, values, or goals of a party can hold]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/ussc-upholds-washington-state/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/ussc-upholds-washington-state/</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FEATURE</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">nomination</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">party affiliation</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">primary</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">right to association</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">United States Supreme Court</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:45:21 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Riverside County&apos;s Law Enforcement Leaders Back John Malloy for Judge</title>
            <description>
<![CDATA[Riverside County's law enforcement leaders are rallying behind Deputy District Attorney John Molloy's campaign for judge.&nbsp; Molloy is seeking election to Riverside County's 18th Judicial Seat that has been vacant since the State of California removed Robert Spitzer as a judge because of his misconduct while in office.John Molloy has earned the support from Riverside County's top two law enforcement officers, County Sheriff Stan Sniff and District Attorney Rod Pacheco.&nbsp;"John Molloy is an ethical and principled prosecutor," Pacheco said.&nbsp; "I know he will be a judge who is tough on crime while making sure that our court system provides justice]]>

</description>
            <link>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/riverside-countys-law-enforcem/</link>
            <guid>http://www.redcounty.com/rclaw/2008/03/riverside-countys-law-enforcem/</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John Malloy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County Courts</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Riverside County D.A. Rod Pacheco.</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:46:07 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
