Riverside City Council Going Green?
Posted by: Dave Everett | 12/17/2007 11:33 PM
I'm a little suspicious of this item (Item 20) on today's Riverside City Council agenda:
Excluding the effort to reduce traffic, these sound like every "good intention" that the Democrats use to pave the road to socialism.
I'll be interested to hear the details of these initiatives. I bet they take away my freedom and give more control to the government. I hope I am wrong. I would also be curious to find out if Loveridge, Melendrez or Hart asked this to be put on the agenda. Mayor Loveridge (D) put this on the agenda. I guess it was part of his 2007 State of the City speech.
In addition, it should provide a chance to see if our new councilmen, Mike Gardner (Rep. *pictured above), Chris Mac Arthur (Rep.) and Rusty Bailey (Ind.), favor an over-burdensome regulation approach or an incentive/market based approach to the push to be perceived as "green."
They also have this expenditure on the agenda that would get the Al Gore seal of approval.
Nothing too outrageous, but I'd still rather see them spending $204,845 toward fighting crime near University Dr.
The Riverside City Council meets Tuesday in the Art Pick Council Chamber at City Hall, 3900 Main St. The afternoon session begins at 3 p.m. with public hearings, followed by public comment, the Redevelopment Agency consent calendar and closed sessions. The evening meeting begins at 6:30 p.m.


"Suppose that climate change is not real and all we do is adopt green technologies which our economy and our technology is perfectly capable of. Then all we've done is given our kids a cleaner world. But suppose they're wrong and climate change is real and we've done nothing. What kind of a planet are we going to pass on to the next generation of Americans?"
John McCain, Republican Presidential Debate, Des Moines, Iowa, Dec. 12, 2007