MSU-UCI: Campus Supporters of Terror Group Hamas
Posted by: Jonathan Constantine | 05/15/2008 10:17 AM
Though the Muslim Student Union tries to mask themselves as an innocent religious and cultural organization, their advocacy for terror groups proves otherwise.
Their praise for Hamas is especially alarming. Not only does Hamas fundamentally reject peace talks, but their charter calls for the elimination of Israel and pledges for "the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine." In seeking this ominous ideal, the group is responsible for over 350 terror attacks, and the deaths of 500 innocent people.
Below are honorary photos from the MSU's mock Israeli wall:
Hamas as resistance to "occupation:"
Praising the terror group as humanitarians. By programs, orphanages, and schools do they mean terror indoctrination camps?
Their praise for Hamas is especially alarming. Not only does Hamas fundamentally reject peace talks, but their charter calls for the elimination of Israel and pledges for "the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine." In seeking this ominous ideal, the group is responsible for over 350 terror attacks, and the deaths of 500 innocent people.
Below are honorary photos from the MSU's mock Israeli wall:
Hamas as resistance to "occupation:"



Oh my dear G-d. That is horrible. No debating their terrorist support.
"Fair and Democratic Roof Tossings" is more like it.
Below is the text of a letter to the opinion page of the New University Newspaper (UCI) tonight regarding the past two weeks of Israeli-Palestinian "discourse".
(I don't know if it will be printed next week.)
Now that the Israel 60th Birthday celebration and the “Palestinian Holocaust” week have concluded, I would like to make a few brief comments. I have commented in the past on the words of Amir Abdel Malik Ali and Mohammed Al-Asi, so I won’t repeat them here.
I would hope, however, that casual student observers will compare and contrast the tone of each week. The Israeli celebration was upbeat and happy, while some of the MSU’s speakers (not all) used inflammatory language to describe Israel and America. At least three of the speakers (Malik Ali, Al-Asi and Norman Finklestein are vocal supporters of Hamas and Hizbollah-terrorist organizations.
There were two items on the “Wall” put up by the MSU that drew my attention. First was a quotation from former Black Panther, H. Rap Brown (who now bears a Muslim name that escapes me). H. Rap Brown now sits in prison for the murder of a police officer (that had nothing to do with any “struggle“). Second was a picture of Ariel Sharon, drawn in the old style of Julius Streicher’s Der Stuermer, a virulent, anti-Semitic Nazi newspaper of the Third Reich. The picture featured the big hooked nose, big lips and all that. To anyone who is unfamiliar with Streicher and Der Stuermer, I urge you to do the research. That a university would even allow this type of picture on its campus is a disgrace. It is anti-Semitic and racist.
During Finklestein’s appearance, hundreds came to hear him speak including professors and deans. Yet the same week, about 20 people came to hear Nonie Darwish, a courageous former Muslim who has put her life on the line to defend Israel, America and condemn terror. I was the only faculty member present (and I am only a part-time teacher).
During Al-Asi’s vitriolic speech, several deans scurried about playing hall monitor, moving Jewish protestors here and there and keeping walkways clear for students. That‘s all well and good, yet, during the speech, a busload of about 20 young schoolchildren, visiting the campus for a tour, stood outside their bus just yards from Al-Asi’s vitriolic speech. I wonder if there were any Jewish children in that crowd. Why did any of those kids have to be exposed to this? Where were the hall monitors?
To be sure, a few of the MSU’s speakers were not vitriolic. I am referring to Ms Anna Balzer and Mr and Mrs Corrie, who tragically lost their daughter. They seem like decent people, there was nothing objectionable in what I heard the Corries say, and I sympathize with them. I wish, however, that they had been present on Thursday to hear the words of Malik Ali (I don‘t believe they were present.) It might have given them pause.
Finally, David Horowitz, in his campus appearance singled out UCI as “the worst campus in this country” for anti-Semitic activity. In the question and answer period, I informed Mr Horowitz that 99% of the students at UCI have nothing to do with this ugliness. I also told him that there are two problems: first, the MSU (that brings in hateful speakers); second a university administration that is hiding under their desks, either out of fear, apathy or that they just don’t care about the concerns of their Jewish students.
The public needs to know what is going on at UCI, and I hope Horowitz and others keep the spotlight shining.
Gary Fouse
Adjunct teacher
UCI-Ext
http://concerneducistudent.blogspot.com/search/label/Sheik%20Ahmed%20Yassin
Jonathan,
You might want to link up with the following blog:
radarsite
editor: Roger Gardner
Arlington , Va
They are following the events at UCI, printing my articles and making a lot of comments. They are very supportive.
You are correct Jonathan. By now, it is clear that the MSU supports Hamas, Hizbollah, acts of terror and the destruction of Israel. Also keep in mind that Hizbollah is responsible for more American deaths than any other terrorist organization other than Al-Qaida- and that is only because of 9-11. That is the organization (Hizbollah) that the MSU supports.
Gary, the mouthpiece of the Zionazi movement.
First off Mr. Fouse there was no such group called "Hezbollah" when the American and French barracks were bombed.
Secondly after the bombing no one in the Reagan administration, from George H.W. Bush to Casper Weinberger were able to even remotely find a credible perpetrator to retaliate against. Remember Reagan was no Carter; if he know "Hezbollah" was behind the bombing he would have opened up a can of whoop ass faster than Ollie North could shred documents.
Please get your head out of Jewish A$$. You might see the truth then.
Sorry son, Hizbollah is still the main suspect along with the other mopes. The people in Hizbollah were underground at the time and did not announce their existance until 1985. Those who announced themselves as Hizbollah later are still believed to be involved (Unless it was the Young Republicans).
As for Reagan, as good as he was in most respects, I don't think he showed that much in the Middle East. He pulled the troops out after the bombing.