Charlie's Angels - AJ Editor Tows the Brown Line on "DebateGate"
Posted by: Aaron Park | 08/31/2008 10:05 PM
Auburn Journal Editor Deric Rothe has decided to continue using his newspaper to promote the candidacy of Charlie Brown.
As you may remember - Rothe and the Journal were a broken record against John Doolittle. Recently, the AJ was the ONLY local media outlet to run a since-debunked story that Tood Stenhouse shopped around the whole region about no drilling going on off of the Coast of Florida. (ICYMI - yesterday on this Blog, a story was posted citing people in Florida complaining about seeing Chinese Oil rigs off of their coast)
Now the Auburn Journal has decided to tell us how they think the debates should go down.
The Journal writes one of the most disingenuous lines ever seen in a newspaper, "Instead of trying to fix the format for their own benefits, the candidates should instead do the honorable thing and treat each other, and the voters, with respect."
Rothe must have relapsed - or he is demonstrating his clear bias in support of Brown. Rothe knows damn good and well that the short-controlled format that Rothe suggests is exactly what the Brown team is going for.
Does Rothe know what team Brown does - that Charlie can not be exposed to lengthy answers to questions? Two minute answers as Rothe suggests are nothing more than glorified soundbytes.
Why has Charlie Brown decided to hide behind Deric Rothe? Rothe's track record is abysmal, his past notwithstanding.
Why is Brown seeking to avoid an open debate with questions between candidates? What is Brown trying to hide from? Is Brown unsure of all the carefully worded positions on his website?
Notes to Deric Rothe:
You wrote "both McClintock and Brown are Patriotic Americans" - why didn't you follow up asking for Brown to confirm or deny his anti-war activism? Why didn't you follow up regarding hyperbolic attacks against Tom McClintock over the Veteran's issue. Your sentence was an all too simple whitewashing of a critical issue in this campaign.
You wrote: "untrue accusations such as Brown supports the Man Boy Love Association or that McClintock doesn't know where Placer County is located are an insult to voters' intelligence" - again, you have whitewashed Brown's membership in the ACLU which he reaffirmed to a very liberal group called Blue America.
Brown's crowd has sought to tar and feather the CRA - using the behavior of some of its' members to project onto McClintock. Since the ACLU fights against Megan's Law, Jessica's Law and defends pedophiles in court - an ACLU membership just does not look good at all.
Rothe finishes his screed by saying that Abortion and Gay Marriage are not important issues. Rothe not only shows his abject bias - but he also demonstrates that foundational core concepts of society are not important to him. Those would be the sanctity of life and the societal foundation of marriage.
Rothe says he hopes that the Congressional election will rise above the muck and mire - both Rothe has chosen a side and slung mud of his own.
As you may remember - Rothe and the Journal were a broken record against John Doolittle. Recently, the AJ was the ONLY local media outlet to run a since-debunked story that Tood Stenhouse shopped around the whole region about no drilling going on off of the Coast of Florida. (ICYMI - yesterday on this Blog, a story was posted citing people in Florida complaining about seeing Chinese Oil rigs off of their coast)
Now the Auburn Journal has decided to tell us how they think the debates should go down.
The Journal writes one of the most disingenuous lines ever seen in a newspaper, "Instead of trying to fix the format for their own benefits, the candidates should instead do the honorable thing and treat each other, and the voters, with respect."
Rothe must have relapsed - or he is demonstrating his clear bias in support of Brown. Rothe knows damn good and well that the short-controlled format that Rothe suggests is exactly what the Brown team is going for.
Does Rothe know what team Brown does - that Charlie can not be exposed to lengthy answers to questions? Two minute answers as Rothe suggests are nothing more than glorified soundbytes.
Why has Charlie Brown decided to hide behind Deric Rothe? Rothe's track record is abysmal, his past notwithstanding.
Why is Brown seeking to avoid an open debate with questions between candidates? What is Brown trying to hide from? Is Brown unsure of all the carefully worded positions on his website?
Notes to Deric Rothe:
You wrote "both McClintock and Brown are Patriotic Americans" - why didn't you follow up asking for Brown to confirm or deny his anti-war activism? Why didn't you follow up regarding hyperbolic attacks against Tom McClintock over the Veteran's issue. Your sentence was an all too simple whitewashing of a critical issue in this campaign.
You wrote: "untrue accusations such as Brown supports the Man Boy Love Association or that McClintock doesn't know where Placer County is located are an insult to voters' intelligence" - again, you have whitewashed Brown's membership in the ACLU which he reaffirmed to a very liberal group called Blue America.
Brown's crowd has sought to tar and feather the CRA - using the behavior of some of its' members to project onto McClintock. Since the ACLU fights against Megan's Law, Jessica's Law and defends pedophiles in court - an ACLU membership just does not look good at all.
Rothe finishes his screed by saying that Abortion and Gay Marriage are not important issues. Rothe not only shows his abject bias - but he also demonstrates that foundational core concepts of society are not important to him. Those would be the sanctity of life and the societal foundation of marriage.
Rothe says he hopes that the Congressional election will rise above the muck and mire - both Rothe has chosen a side and slung mud of his own.
CATEGORY:
4th Congressional District Race
Women's right to vote didn't exist until they fought for it. Blacks rights for equality didn't happen until...
"...the candidates should instead do the honorable thing and treat each other, and the voters, with respect."
I think this is exactly what Tom was trying to do when he said he wanted to have the Lincoln-Douglas style debates that open the floor to some real discussion between both candidates. It's too bad that all Charlie Brown is capable of are these two minute sound bytes. Voters are tired of the one-liners, and want a candidate who is going to offer some really susbstantive answers to these tough questions facing our country today. Tom has an outstanding record in the legislature for standing up to big government and making the right decisions when it comes to implementing policy for his constituents.
The 4th CD doesn't need the "talk" coming from the Brown team. We need action. On the big issue of energy, Tom will stand up to Pelosi and her team of Democrats to help bring energy prices back down. He made the pledge to not raise taxes, but will cut into the deficit by lowering spending. These are all things that are important to California and the 4th.