PLACER

 
 

Rep. John Campbell: Out-of-control Spending

Posted by: Ken Campbell | 07/03/2008 10:37 AM

"The federal budget deficit for 2008 will almost certainly be the largest deficit in
history. That's pretty big news. You would think that would be splashed all over
everywhere. But it's not.

Why not? Because a coalition of Democrat and Republican spenders and
earmarkers don't want you to interfere with their pork and pet spending projects."

 

Bloger's note: This piece is from the Orange County Register (below and link here), by Congressman John Campbell, telling us of Congress's spending addiction that all starts with earmarks/ pork.  Ose type Republicans joining with Democrats to squander our hard-earned tax money and run our country into debt.

 

It must be noted that politicians learn their spending habits early in their political career.  For example, our own Placer County Board of Supervisors have a junior earmark/ pork program ("revenue sharing") where they spend taxpayer's money in areas government should have no involvement-- with the only purpose, as Bruce Kranz puts it (BTW Bruce is the only supervisor to oppose this scam), to buy votes.

 

Enjoy reading how politicians are running our country into the ground.

 

Rep. Campbell: out-of-control spending

Big spenders from both parties have run up history's biggest deficit
By U.S. REP. JOHN CAMPBELL
THE IRVINE REPUBLICAN REPRESENTS THE 48TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT

 

The federal budget deficit for 2008 will almost certainly be the largest deficit in
history. That's pretty big news. You would think that would be splashed all over
everywhere. But it's not.

 

Why not? Because a coalition of Democrat and Republican spenders and
earmarkers don't want you to interfere with their pork and pet spending projects.
Democrats have always been, and continue to be, the party of tax and spend. But in
recent years, a powerful contingent of borrow-and-spend Republicans has joined
forces with them to waste ever more of your money on an increasingly widening
array of earmarks, new programs and new entitlements.

 

These spenders have put us into what is unquestionably the deepest fiscal crisis in
our nation's history. Here are a few facts about where we are:

•  The deficit for this year is now projected to be $475 billion, easily eclipsing the
previous record, set in 2004. That's almost half a trillion dollars. And that number
does not include $185 billion raided from Social Security payments. The real deficit,
therefore, is more than $600 billion.

•  Despite this reality, the appropriations committee just released its proposal to
increase spending next year by another 7.7 percent. Revenue is currently flat
because of the weak economy.

•  That increase will push the deficit for 2009 to maybe $700 billion. Even a President
Obama might find it hard to raise taxes enough to collect that much more money.

•  The current budget had thousands of unnecessary and often corrupt earmarks,
totaling $18.3 billion. The next budget appears it will have even more.

•  Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid all are actually bankrupt and have
autopilot annual increases that at current rates will consume 100 percent of your
taxes by 2040, leaving no room for a military, parks, courts or anything else without
more taxes.
 
•  All of this is an insidious wealth transfer from our kids to us. It increases our debt,
further hurts the value of the weak dollar (which accounts for much of the increase in
the price of gas) and will put upward pressure on interest rates.

•  Every week (without exception recently), Congress votes to spend even more
money, creating new programs, new agencies and new entitlements that are not
even included in all the numbers listed above. After spending $261 billion on
"supplemental emergency spending" in June, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-
Nev., now has a proposal to spend billions more on a "second supplemental."

 

All of this happens because Republican spenders won't criticize Democrat spending
if Democrats won't criticize Republicans' spending. If I want to spend a dollar, and
you want to spend a dollar, we compromise by spending both. Politicians win.
Special interests win. Taxpayers lose.

 

So what do we do about it?
 
•  Get the word out that we have a big, big problem so the public is engaged.

•  Eliminate earmarks as we know them. Spenders win votes by threatening to take
out your $200,000 earmark if you don't vote for this $400 billion bill. Earmarks are
the gateway drug to overspending.

•  Don't spend on something new without cutting some existing spending.
 
•  Don't raise taxes because that never works to stop deficits. It just increases the
spending level from which the deficit begins.

•  Enact a constitutional spending-limit amendment, like the one I have introduced
(H.J. Res. 81).

•  Enact (or at least begin to talk about) a complete overhaul of the entitlement
programs and the tax system like the Wisconsin Republican Rep. Paul Ryan's
American Roadmap. (www.americanroadmap.org) Without overhaul, either
entitlements or our competitiveness will die.

 

We can solve this, but it takes bold action right now. The longer we wait, the bolder
that action will have to be.

 

 

Comments

Aaron Park Author Profile Page said:

Do you think Jennifer Montgomery is going to do any better?

She'd take her "junior earmarks" and give them to the sierra club.

BTW - did you ever find out if Placer's Junior Earmark program is unique? It is there because of a state mandate?

If so - we will need you to lead a referrendum to change the consitiution to ban the practice.

Ken Campbell said:

"BTW - did you ever find out if Placer's Junior Earmark program is unique?"

That is a great question Aaron. No Placer's Junior Earmark program is not unique... Congress does it too and they are spending our country into debt.

Bruce Kranz was the only supervisor to speak out against Placer's Junior Earmark program. In fact, when Bruce was chairman he make the board vote on the earmarks, going on record, rather then sending it through the consent calendar. The four other supervisors chose to continue to earmark. Bruce Kranz received no support in his quest to eliminate county earmarks so Placer County's Junior Earmark program continues. Bruce Kranz tried, but the people needed to stand up and say, "Knock it off, stop that irresponsible spending!"

Aaron Park Author Profile Page said:

OK - so Bruce is off the hook.

Was Kirk on the Board when Bruce led that charge?

Do these County Level Junior Earmarks occur in the other 57 counties, does this practice occur because of a state mandate?

I was not asking about comparing the County to Congress - i was asking if the other 57 counties engage in this practice as well. If they do, and it is due to a state mandate, let's get an initiative together and put it on the ballot to ban the practice.

Next, who has spent what on what?

Where does Weygant's money go? I think I have a good idea - but do you know? has he spent all of it?

What about Kirk, Rocky and Jim Holmes? What have they done with their allotments?

How much are the allotments? What percentage of the county budget are they?

This could be an excellent issue - maybe you could write a separate post and answer all the above questions?

Happy 4th, Ken!

Leave a comment

 
 

SPONSORED LINKS

Stay Connected

Daily Headlines
Please Enter Your E-Mail Address


RSS Feeds

Comments

Tommy J commented about

OTT: Veterans for Freedom PAC E-Mail has Timely Advice for Charlie Brown

08/28/2008 2:08 PM

Tommy J commented about

Polling Data on Energy Issue - Sorry Charlie

08/28/2008 1:46 PM

Tommy J commented about

The Per-Diem Issue Gets Buried by Captiol Staff

08/28/2008 1:43 PM

Lee Reed commented about

The Per-Diem Issue Gets Buried by Captiol Staff

08/28/2008 1:17 PM

Aaron Park commented about

The Per-Diem Issue Gets Buried by Captiol Staff

08/28/2008 12:54 PM

Aaron Park commented about

Polling Data on Energy Issue - Sorry Charlie

08/28/2008 12:47 PM

Bob commented about

OTT: Veterans for Freedom PAC E-Mail has Timely Advice for Charlie Brown

08/28/2008 12:46 PM

Bob commented about

Polling Data on Energy Issue - Sorry Charlie

08/28/2008 12:41 PM

Bob commented about

The Per-Diem Issue Gets Buried by Captiol Staff

08/28/2008 12:31 PM

Lee Reed commented about

Polling Data on Energy Issue - Sorry Charlie

08/28/2008 12:06 PM

Bob commented about

Republicans for Brown start new Website? Republicans against Prop 8

08/28/2008 12:05 PM

Tiny Tim commented about

The Per-Diem Issue Gets Buried by Captiol Staff

08/28/2008 11:52 AM

Bob commented about

Polling Data on Energy Issue - Sorry Charlie

08/28/2008 10:49 AM

DavidO commented about

Republicans for Brown start new Website? Republicans against Prop 8

08/28/2008 10:17 AM

Aaron Park commented about

The Per-Diem Issue Gets Buried by Captiol Staff

08/28/2008 8:41 AM