Profile | Matthew Cunningham
Website | Pacific Strategies
» Follow Me on Twitter
» My Facebook
Author's Latest Posts |
- SD34: Knocking Down Rumores
- Ft. Hood: President Jump-To-Conclusions Wants Us To "Withhold...
- AD72 Special Election Watch: Looking Grim For Ackerman
- SD34 Watch: More On Sue Perez
- OC Register Schizophrenia
More»
Paul Walters Responds To Moorlach On CCWs
By Matthew Cunningham | 11/20/08 | 04:44 PM EDT | 0 Comments
At Tuesday's Board of Supervisors meeting, Sup. John Moorlach defended his previous statement that Sheriff Hutchen's attitude toward CCW (concealed carry weapon) permits by saying we "wouldn't have liked Paul Walter's" CCW policy.
Walters has responded with this letter to Sup. Moorlach, sent today:
Well, that could be a simple clarification of the record. It could also be Walters' staking a preliminary claim to this constituency's loyalty if he decides to run for Sheriff in 2010 -- which I think depends upon Sheriff Hutchen's political health. June2020 2010 is a long way away.
Walters has responded with this letter to Sup. Moorlach, sent today:
November 20, 2008
John M. W. Moorlach
Board Chairman
Orange County Supervisor, Second District
10 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Dear Supervisor Moorlach:
I am writing to correct your statement regarding my CCW Policy at the November 18th Board of Supervisor's meeting, per:
"You would not have been happy with Paul Walters. His permit policy was almost exclusively for those that were retired police officers." - 4:08:15 of the afternoon session
The CCW policy you attribute to me is actually the current, long-standing CCW policy adhered to by members of Orange County Chiefs and Sheriffs Association, one that requests the Police Chiefs refer CCW permit applications to the Sheriff, except in cases of former officers. It is only within this context that your statement above is true.
I previously conveyed to the members of the BOS and their staffs, press and editorial staff throughout the appointment process that my CCW Policy would call for legitimate background checks of applicants, proper training and would have had a good-cause standard that meets the needs of our community. I have never proposed the restrictive, newly revised, extremely limited good-cause standard as put forth by Sheriff Hutchens. The one part of the CCW policy on which the sheriff and I do agree is that permits should not be given based solely on a quid pro quo, money or contribution for a CCW. Clearly those that received a permit based solely on the political support of or personal affiliation with Sheriff Carona should have their permit revisited and possibly revoked.
My CCW policy is more open and intent- to-revoke letters would not have been sent to permit holders unless there was clear justification that their permit was obtained through nefarious means or they have violated the terms of their permit. My process would be responsive to the wishes of most County residents - that being the CCW policy have a legitimate background check, be transparent, open, consistent, ethical, and having a reasonable good-cause standard.
I request your misrepresentation of my CCW Policy be corrected at your next board meeting as it is harmful to me. Thank you for your consideration.
Regards,
Paul M. Walters
Chief of Police, Santa Ana
cc: Supervisor Patricia C. Bates
Supervisor Bill Campbell
Supervisor Janet Nguyen
Supervisor Chris Norby
Well, that could be a simple clarification of the record. It could also be Walters' staking a preliminary claim to this constituency's loyalty if he decides to run for Sheriff in 2010 -- which I think depends upon Sheriff Hutchen's political health. June
0 Comments | Related Topics »Orange County (CA) | 2010 Elections
RECOMMENDED SITES














Comments
Post new comment