No On Measure G
Posted by: Jubal | 06/02/2008 4:39 PM
During our Red County Radio Roundtable on Friday, the topic of Measure G came up and both Adam Probolsky and Nick Berardino confidently predicted the $200 million Santa Ana school bond would fail to garner the necessary two-thirds majority and go down to defeat.
One reason is the Orange County Labor Federation paid for this anti-Measure G mail piece that went out last week:
The unions aren't opposed to passing a $200 million school bond. But they're opposed to passing a $200 million school bond that doesn't contain a project labor agreement -- which Measure G lacks.
If I lived in Santa Ana, I'd oppose Measure G, as well, but for a different reason: I don't believe in rewarding failure.
I'm not referring solely to the Santa Ana Unified School District's mismanagement of the previous bond, although that episode should make anyone think twice before entrusting the SAUSD with another pot of bond money.
I mean the overall failure of SAUSD schools. Instead of rattling the tin cup for more tax dollars, why doesn't the SAUSD work within its existing resources to provide a better education. Are we supposed to believe the education being provided in SAUSD classroom will magically improve if the classrooms are nicer?
My suggestion is for SAUSD to first improve the quality of education going on inside of their schools before going back to the taxapyers for more money to fix up the schools. It's not as if SAUSD students are uneducable. The children in the district's fundamental schools do very well. Here's a brainstorm: why not make every SAUSD school a fundamental school, instead of restricting them to the fortunate few parents who win the entry lottery.
I can think of no other organized enterprise of the scale of public education in which revenues are divorced from the quality of results. Until public education is re-structured so that revenues correlate to a school's success or failure on providing a quality education, bonds like Measure G are just nibbling at the edges.
Vote No on measure G.
One reason is the Orange County Labor Federation paid for this anti-Measure G mail piece that went out last week:
The unions aren't opposed to passing a $200 million school bond. But they're opposed to passing a $200 million school bond that doesn't contain a project labor agreement -- which Measure G lacks.
If I lived in Santa Ana, I'd oppose Measure G, as well, but for a different reason: I don't believe in rewarding failure.
I'm not referring solely to the Santa Ana Unified School District's mismanagement of the previous bond, although that episode should make anyone think twice before entrusting the SAUSD with another pot of bond money.
I mean the overall failure of SAUSD schools. Instead of rattling the tin cup for more tax dollars, why doesn't the SAUSD work within its existing resources to provide a better education. Are we supposed to believe the education being provided in SAUSD classroom will magically improve if the classrooms are nicer?
My suggestion is for SAUSD to first improve the quality of education going on inside of their schools before going back to the taxapyers for more money to fix up the schools. It's not as if SAUSD students are uneducable. The children in the district's fundamental schools do very well. Here's a brainstorm: why not make every SAUSD school a fundamental school, instead of restricting them to the fortunate few parents who win the entry lottery.
I can think of no other organized enterprise of the scale of public education in which revenues are divorced from the quality of results. Until public education is re-structured so that revenues correlate to a school's success or failure on providing a quality education, bonds like Measure G are just nibbling at the edges.
Vote No on measure G.
CATEGORY:
2008 Elections, At The Trough









Below is an excellent e-mail Tim Whitacre sent out last week to a group of Santa Ana residents explaining why we should oppose Measure G. I thought it was worth posting here:
Like a bad dream, “They’re baaaack”…same theme, same tactics, and similar cast of characters.
Before you vote yes on Measure G, ask yourself this: “Do I really want to be responsible for approximately THREE-QUARTERS OF A BILLION DOLLARS in unfunded debt that my Children and Grandchildren will have to pay for?”
Simply put, a Bond is a self-imposed tax. Voters willfully and unknowingly put themselves in “Bondage” for a long period of time to pay back the initial amount of the Bond plus all of the interest that accrues. Usually, the amount repaid is triple the amount you vote for on the ballot.
Taxes, like death, are color blind. They adversely affect everyone regardless of their ability to pay. A Bond is the worst kind of tax and should only be used as a last resort once every other option has been explored and applied to the problem. Clearly, this isn’t the case with SAUSD which is why we should not even consider a Bond at this time.
Measure G is nothing more than son of Measure C. Once again, those hardest hit by passage of this tax scheme (that’s truly what most Bonds are) are those who can least afford to pay: The poor and the elderly on fixed income. Because like C, G will be apportioned out according to property owners; apartment owners and commercial building owners will be hit the hardest with the biggest tax bills. They of course will pass on that increase in higher rents and higher costs of goods and services to the residents, so the TRUE COST of a Bond is much greater than what’s disclosed to the voters in the voting material. The financial implications are HUGE for decades to come.
I was the lone, vocal opponent to Measure C and advocated against at it at great personal costs. I was proven right about what would happen if it passed – and it did – we were duped; sold a bill of goods; we bought into “But it’s for the Children” mantra. Measure C was unnecessary, excessive and grossly mismanaged by an incompetent school board. I am concerned with more important things in my life at the moment so I couldn’t take an active stand against Measure G. However, I want to strongly encourage everyone receiving this reply to Glenn and Julie Stroud’s e-mail to staunchly OPPOSE Measure G. It is every bit as bad as Measure C.
A lot of the same “powers that be” who endorsed and rammed Measure C down our throats are behind Measure G. Even after admitting Measure C was a failure and a bad idea, they’re at it again. Allowing an elected body to pass a Bond is giving them a way out the back door from being accountable to the voters for their actions. Force the Board of Trustees to roll up their sleeves, put their petty differences aside and make the tough decisions necessary to put SAUSD back on a fiscally prudent and responsible track. We have to do it every month with our own finances - so should they with OUR tax dollars.
Look what we got with Measure C…that’s exactly what we’ll get with Measure G…we have a similar Board; we’ll have similar results…
The honest truth is we don’t need a Bond to fix what’s wrong with SAUSD. Whether or not you have children in the schools, this Bond will adversely affect you. The best, quickest fix we can make to SAUSD and our City is to vote for three qualified fellow residents in November to replace any of the current School Board Trustees up for re-election who are shoving Measure G down our throats with the help of outside special interest groups.
Haven’t we had enough of this? Haven’t we learned our lesson with Measure C?
There is no formal opposition to Measure G, this is it. It’s up to us to pass the word and hold the line against incumbency protection, cronyism and outside special interest groups meddling with our schools for the sole reason of big financial gains through the backroom deals made with our Elected Officials.
Truly, “For the Children; because of the Children,” vote NO on Measure G. DO NOT put this financial burden on their backs. We might pass it, but it’s the next generation or two who will pay for our mistakes because that’s how long it will take to pay off both Measure C AND Measure G. Buying into this regurgitated tax scheme and passing both Measure C and Measure G, will saddle the residents of Santa Ana with approximately THREE-QUARTERS OF A BILLION DOLLARS in debt after paying back the interest on this self-imposed tax. Now do you see why it’s called a Bond (Bondage)?
If we all do something right now, we can stop another train wreck from happening. The proponents are hoping we’re too apathetic; too busy; too pre-occupied with other things to do anything about this. They’re wringing their hands and laughing amongst themselves about how easily it appears to manipulate us. Are they right?
IT’S URGENT YOU TELL ALL OF YOUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS TO VOTE NO ON MEASURE G. If you’ve already voted “yes” by absentee ballot, you can negate that vote by voting in person either at the Registrar of Voters office or at your local polling booth. It really IS THAT IMPORTANT.
Semper Fi,
Tim Whitacre
PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL TO/CALL FIVE (5) SANTA ANA VOTERS YOU KNOW AND TELL THEM TO VOTE “NO” ON MEASURE G.
NO on Measure G!!!