OC BLOG

 
 

No On Measure G

Posted by: Jubal | 06/02/2008 4:39 PM

During our Red County Radio Roundtable on Friday, the topic of Measure G came up and both Adam Probolsky and Nick Berardino confidently predicted the $200 million Santa Ana school bond would fail to garner the necessary two-thirds majority and go down to defeat.

One reason is the Orange County Labor Federation paid for this anti-Measure G mail piece that went out last week:



The unions aren't opposed to passing a $200 million school bond. But they're opposed to passing a $200 million school bond that doesn't contain a project labor agreement -- which Measure G lacks.

If I lived in Santa Ana, I'd oppose Measure G, as well, but for a different reason: I don't believe in rewarding failure.

I'm not referring solely to the Santa Ana Unified School District's mismanagement of the previous bond, although that episode should make anyone think twice before entrusting the SAUSD with another pot of bond money.

I mean the overall failure of SAUSD schools. Instead of rattling the tin cup for more tax dollars, why doesn't the SAUSD work within its existing resources to provide a better education. Are we supposed to believe the education being provided in SAUSD classroom will magically improve if the classrooms are nicer?

My suggestion is for SAUSD to first improve the quality of education going on inside of their schools before going back to the taxapyers for more money to fix up the schools. It's not as if SAUSD students are uneducable. The children in the district's fundamental schools do very well. Here's a brainstorm: why not make every SAUSD school a fundamental school, instead of restricting them to the fortunate few parents who win the entry lottery.

I can think of no other organized enterprise of the scale of public education in which revenues are divorced from the quality of results. Until public education is re-structured so that revenues correlate to a school's success or failure on providing a quality education, bonds like Measure G are just nibbling at the edges.

Vote No on measure G.

Comments

Santa Ana Voter said:

Below is an excellent e-mail Tim Whitacre sent out last week to a group of Santa Ana residents explaining why we should oppose Measure G. I thought it was worth posting here:

Like a bad dream, “They’re baaaack”…same theme, same tactics, and similar cast of characters.

Before you vote yes on Measure G, ask yourself this: “Do I really want to be responsible for approximately THREE-QUARTERS OF A BILLION DOLLARS in unfunded debt that my Children and Grandchildren will have to pay for?”

Simply put, a Bond is a self-imposed tax. Voters willfully and unknowingly put themselves in “Bondage” for a long period of time to pay back the initial amount of the Bond plus all of the interest that accrues. Usually, the amount repaid is triple the amount you vote for on the ballot.

Taxes, like death, are color blind. They adversely affect everyone regardless of their ability to pay. A Bond is the worst kind of tax and should only be used as a last resort once every other option has been explored and applied to the problem. Clearly, this isn’t the case with SAUSD which is why we should not even consider a Bond at this time.

Measure G is nothing more than son of Measure C. Once again, those hardest hit by passage of this tax scheme (that’s truly what most Bonds are) are those who can least afford to pay: The poor and the elderly on fixed income. Because like C, G will be apportioned out according to property owners; apartment owners and commercial building owners will be hit the hardest with the biggest tax bills. They of course will pass on that increase in higher rents and higher costs of goods and services to the residents, so the TRUE COST of a Bond is much greater than what’s disclosed to the voters in the voting material. The financial implications are HUGE for decades to come.

I was the lone, vocal opponent to Measure C and advocated against at it at great personal costs. I was proven right about what would happen if it passed – and it did – we were duped; sold a bill of goods; we bought into “But it’s for the Children” mantra. Measure C was unnecessary, excessive and grossly mismanaged by an incompetent school board. I am concerned with more important things in my life at the moment so I couldn’t take an active stand against Measure G. However, I want to strongly encourage everyone receiving this reply to Glenn and Julie Stroud’s e-mail to staunchly OPPOSE Measure G. It is every bit as bad as Measure C.

A lot of the same “powers that be” who endorsed and rammed Measure C down our throats are behind Measure G. Even after admitting Measure C was a failure and a bad idea, they’re at it again. Allowing an elected body to pass a Bond is giving them a way out the back door from being accountable to the voters for their actions. Force the Board of Trustees to roll up their sleeves, put their petty differences aside and make the tough decisions necessary to put SAUSD back on a fiscally prudent and responsible track. We have to do it every month with our own finances - so should they with OUR tax dollars.

Look what we got with Measure C…that’s exactly what we’ll get with Measure G…we have a similar Board; we’ll have similar results…

The honest truth is we don’t need a Bond to fix what’s wrong with SAUSD. Whether or not you have children in the schools, this Bond will adversely affect you. The best, quickest fix we can make to SAUSD and our City is to vote for three qualified fellow residents in November to replace any of the current School Board Trustees up for re-election who are shoving Measure G down our throats with the help of outside special interest groups.

Haven’t we had enough of this? Haven’t we learned our lesson with Measure C?

There is no formal opposition to Measure G, this is it. It’s up to us to pass the word and hold the line against incumbency protection, cronyism and outside special interest groups meddling with our schools for the sole reason of big financial gains through the backroom deals made with our Elected Officials.

Truly, “For the Children; because of the Children,” vote NO on Measure G. DO NOT put this financial burden on their backs. We might pass it, but it’s the next generation or two who will pay for our mistakes because that’s how long it will take to pay off both Measure C AND Measure G. Buying into this regurgitated tax scheme and passing both Measure C and Measure G, will saddle the residents of Santa Ana with approximately THREE-QUARTERS OF A BILLION DOLLARS in debt after paying back the interest on this self-imposed tax. Now do you see why it’s called a Bond (Bondage)?

If we all do something right now, we can stop another train wreck from happening. The proponents are hoping we’re too apathetic; too busy; too pre-occupied with other things to do anything about this. They’re wringing their hands and laughing amongst themselves about how easily it appears to manipulate us. Are they right?

IT’S URGENT YOU TELL ALL OF YOUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS TO VOTE NO ON MEASURE G. If you’ve already voted “yes” by absentee ballot, you can negate that vote by voting in person either at the Registrar of Voters office or at your local polling booth. It really IS THAT IMPORTANT.

Semper Fi,

Tim Whitacre

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL TO/CALL FIVE (5) SANTA ANA VOTERS YOU KNOW AND TELL THEM TO VOTE “NO” ON MEASURE G.

I just voted! said:

NO on Measure G!!!

Leave a comment

 

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

 

SPONSORED LINKS

Select a Red County Blog

 
 

Community: Get Involved

Blogpen Login RSS Feeds Daily Dose
Please Enter Your E-Mail Address


Advertise Here

Recent Comments

10/11/2008 3:18 PM

Irv commented about: Harry Sidhu In The Mail

Debbie..Sorry that you feel that way about Harry..Remember their are others on the council. Harry has been a...
 

10/11/2008 3:10 PM

Francesca commented about: Libertarians Should Support Proposition 8

Isn't this just an issue of democracy? The people of California voted against gay marriage. That was the...
 

10/11/2008 2:24 PM

anaheimvoter commented about: Harry Sidhu In The Mail

This is from the Orange County Taypayers Association, and they specifically state that they don't endorse Political Candidates....
 

10/11/2008 2:00 PM

anaheimvoter commented about: Harry Sidhu In The Mail

Debbie, who do you like or thinking of voting for Anaheim City Council. I like Kostas "Gus" Roditis'...
 

10/11/2008 1:46 PM

Virg chain commented about: Signs Of Trouble in Stanton

Political thuggery and bullying is unacceptable from any city official. What are you afaid of "Freedom Writer"(David Shawver)?...
 

10/11/2008 1:39 PM

accounting mistake vs breaking the law commented about: Signs Of Trouble in Stanton

I love how Councilman Shawver ("Freedom Writer")acts like an accounting error (Cadena listing the wrong address for his...
 

10/11/2008 12:06 PM

fix your website commented about: CUSD Recall Committee Endorses A.M. Team for OUSD

fix Alexia's website...kinda a joke to put it up if its incomplete...
 

10/11/2008 11:40 AM

Moedad commented about: Hutchens Making A Hash Of CCWs

Wonderful analysis of the situation, Jubal. WHY the more restrictive policy. That is THE MAIN QUESTION she needs...
 

10/11/2008 11:08 AM

CRA Mentalist commented about: ATLAS PAC and CWLA Endorse Do For Garden Grove Council

October 11, 2008 12:53 AM Altered ego of the CRA Republican? Tactic not getting old and tired? Time...
 

10/11/2008 7:22 AM

HB CCW commented about: Hutchens Making A Hash Of CCWs

Jubal, that is one of the best analyses I have read describing Sheriff Hutchens flawed CCW policy. She...
 

10/11/2008 5:45 AM

Debbie commented about: Harry Sidhu In The Mail

Why would the voters of Anaheim want to vote for you Harry? You were ready to run...
 

10/11/2008 12:53 AM

Andrew Don't commented about: ATLAS PAC and CWLA Endorse Do For Garden Grove Council

Wow! Two more votes for Andrew Do. But do they even live in Garden Grove? AtLas PAC and...
 

10/10/2008 9:51 PM

Fraud Reporter commented about: Westminster Council: "Thanks, but No Thanks."

Vu Chung, the so-called "reporter" from VNCR is a big joke. Can't speak English at the City Council...
 

10/10/2008 9:49 PM

Truth Seeker commented about: Westminster Council: "Thanks, but No Thanks."

Alin Hamade shot himself in the foot by being stupid. He really did not need any help from...
 

10/10/2008 9:46 PM

Dallas commented about: Hutchens Making A Hash Of CCWs

Do you have another attorney general opinion or any other legal opinion to counter the 1977 opinion? In...
 

10/10/2008 9:45 PM

Andrew Don't commented about: The Money Chase in Garden Grove (Part 1)

Imposter @ 4:15 PM, Trung's kicking ass against every one and Anrew the Do Do bird knows that....
 

10/10/2008 9:44 PM

Andrew Don't commented about: The Money Chase in Garden Grove (Part 1)

Imposter @ 4:15 PM, Trung's kicking ass against every one and Anrew the Do Do bird knows that....
 

10/10/2008 8:44 PM

CCWHolder commented about: Hutchens Making A Hash Of CCWs

She keeps quoting the "law" -- what she is quoting is an OPINION from 1977, then Atty General...
 

10/10/2008 7:16 PM

Dallas commented about: Hutchens Making A Hash Of CCWs

I guess this is what you get when you hire a Sheriff who follows the law. Maybe the...
 

10/10/2008 5:57 PM

North County Voter commented about: Hutchens Making A Hash Of CCWs

They have sent out 146 but that's just up to the "J"s. They still have the rest of...
 

Categories

1st Supe District Watch (149)
1st Supervisor District (19)
1st Supervisor District Special Election (350)
2006 Races (1)
2007 Wildfires (11)
2008 Elections (180)
2010 Elections (5)
241 Tollroad (71)
33rd Senate District (11)
34th Senate District (6)
4th Supervisor District (1)
AD60 Watch (69)
AD71 Watch (103)
AD73 Watch (17)
Add category (1)
AHUSD Special Election Drive (9)
Anaheim (1)
At The Trough (98)
Blogworld Expo 2007 (1)
Buena Park (2)
California Stuff (301)
Carol Rudat (7)
CD46 Watch (21)
CD47 Watch (13)
CD48 Watch (1)
CUSD Recall (28)
Daily News Roundup - 2008 (199)
Daily News Roundup -- 2007 (309)
Dana Point (3)
Debbie Cook Ballot Title Lawsuit (3)
Erwin Chemerinsky (1)
Fairness Doctrine (1)
FEATURE (40)
Fullerton (5)
Fund 130 Watch (1)
Garden Grove (6)
General OC Stuff (72)
Greeniacs (10)
Harkey Agonistes (8)
In re Rachel Home School Ruling (1)
Irvine Mayor's Race (10)
La Habra (1)
Ladera Peaker Plant (1)
Leftosphere (3)
Liberty (64)
Loretta for Governor (2)
Making of the President (51)
Making of the President 2008 (104)
Measure D (1)
Measure M Renewal (1)
Mike Carona (62)
Mission Viejo (2)
Monsignor John Urell (13)
National Stuff (64)
Nativo Lopez (1)
Newport Beach (1)
News (31)
NEWS ROUNDUP (1)
Nimby Mouse (45)
NIMBY Watch (1)
OC Blogosphere (64)
OC Blogpourri (7)
OC Judge Races (40)
OC Parks (2)
OC Register Website Lameness (2)
OC Sheriff's Department (52)
OC's Next Sheriff (83)
OC/DC (17)
OCTA (20)
Old School (4)
ONE-ON-ONE (2)
OUSD (15)
Politics Behind the Orange Curtain (533)
Property Rights (14)
Raymond Chandler Quote of the Week (29)
Red County blogs (5)
Red County magazine (3)
Red County Radio (25)
Retroactive Pension Rescission (23)
SanTana (5)
Sarah Palin (7)
SD29 Watch (7)
SD33 Watch (97)
SD34 Watch (3)
SD35 Watch (13)
Steve Ambriz (1)
Tan Nguyen (1)
The 3rd Floor (7)
The 5th Floor (147)
The New Majority (3)
The Perils of Chriss Street (30)
The Sheriff's Race (2)
Theo Lacy (1)
TIN CUP 2 (16)
Transportation (31)
Viet Politics (44)
Westminster (6)