OC BLOG

 
 

Board of Supes Flips On Ladera Peaker Plant

Posted by: Jubal | 05/15/2008 4:53 PM

Score one for the operative NIMBY principle that the squeaky wheel of hysteria gets the grease.

This came over the transom from Sup. Bates office earlier today:

Board of Supervisors Ask Court to Pull the Plug on Electrical "Peaker" Plant Permit in Ladera Ranch

SANTA ANA, CA - Due to ongoing litigation, Supervisor Pat Bates will be releasing the
following statements.

"Upon the advice of County Counsel and the Planning Director, the Board of Supervisors voted to unanimously inform the Superior Court that the environmental documentation provided to the County as part of its permit review and approval process was inadequate. Based on new information, the County now believes that the permit issued by the Planning Commission should be invalidated."

"As an advocate for business and as a representative of Orange County residents, my role is to ensure that there is a balanced and sensible project proposal that meets the needs of both the community as well as private enterprise. The process undertaken to review this project fell short of the necessary effort to provide my office, the Planning Commission and, most importantly, the residents the true scope of the proposal."

"The County's decision to take this position stems from a stark contrast between the approved project allowing 200-hours of annual operation for the electrical generating facility to its expanded scope of more than 2,400-hours of annual operation."

"As an elected official, it is often difficult to make these decisions. My vote supporting the
Board's position on the inadequacy of the permit is no exception. That's what I am elected to
do."

For specific details related to the court filed documents and description of the Board action,
please see the attached case management report.

Patricia C. Bates is the Vice Chair of the Orange County Board of Supervisors, representing the Fifth Supervisorial District.

Here's the accompanying legal document from county counsel, filled with lots of "maybes," "could bes," "suggests" and other terms of precision allowing the county to hit the silk and parachute safely into Ladera Hope-held territory.

So on the day when a complete EIR (in addition to the already done negative declaration) is completed and the peaker plant passes, what will the Board of Supes say to Ladera Hope? Because from what I've seen, the process has absolutely nothing to do with their opposition to the peaker plant. The Father and the Son could certify an EIR, and Ladera Hope would sue because the entire Trinity hadn't signed off.
CATEGORY: NIMBY Watch

Comments

Jim Righeimer said:

What does the EIR say about blackouts? When the County fixes the EIR it needs to move it forward. Ladera needs to provide some of their own electrical capacity and not push it on to some other part of the county. Everyone needs to share the burdens of a modern society.

Green Machine said:

This is just more of the same old south county NIMBY garbage. No jails, no power plants, no airports, no freeways,... I'm beginning to think we should cut them off from services that they don't share the burden for.

ranchgirl said:

Come on people. This is not NIMBY garbage. If homes were built on that hillside I would not oppose that. But a gas fired power plant that used beyond sneaky tactics and questionable info to get approved should be a public concern. I am pro business, but every business and developer should have to follow the same rules to play the game.

Additionally, it has been proven that the power is not needed (reserve peaker power is already exceeded by the CEC's requirements in SoCal). Why not allow Orange County to PLAN ahead and site power plants in appropriate locations? If you look at other CA peaker plants and where they are sited, they are in industrial areas and if homes are nearby it is because they were added after the plant was built. When Ladera Hope showed aerial photos of where these other power plants were located (in industrial areas), and then they showed the Ladera plant, it was laughable how close to homes it is.

What is wrong with letting the county plan based on accurate information? Seems like the responsible thing to do to me.

kim said:

Senator Ackerman said that after his op-ed piece ran in the OC Register, the article that told us how wonderful and necessary the peaker plant would be in Ladera, that his son-in-law received a contract to represent Wellhead. I found that interesting.

Similarly, it's interesting that those who keep beating the drum of support for this plant, are those who make their living doing business with corporations such as SDG&E.

You are all smart enough, and informed enough, to know that we do not need this plant to avoid black outs. There are no valid arguments, which is why the OC Board of Supervisors voted UNANIMOUSLY to put the brakes on this project.

Personally, the concept of billion dollar corporations coming in and thumbing their nose at the public process, is sickening. I question the integrity and ethics of anyone that things such antics are acceptable.

Jubal said:

Wow, Kim. That's quite a statement. Everyone who supports the peaker plant is on the SDG&E payroll?

kim said:

For a talented wordsmith, such as yourself, Jubal, you know better than to make such a jump out of my comment.

"those who keep beating the drum of support for this plant" - that doesnt say 'everyone who supports the peaker,' but those that cant stop talking about their support for the peaker, can you see the difference?

"those who make their living doing business with corporations SUCH AS SDG&E"

Honestly, Ive yet to meet a person that supported this plant, who didnt work in the industry of public planning or power. And, THAT is INTERESTING to me.

Leave a comment

 

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

 

SPONSORED LINKS

Stay Connected

Daily Headlines
Please Enter Your E-Mail Address


RSS Feeds

Comments

Read carefully commented about

Uncontested Elections: Do You Want to Run?

08/07/2008 12:48 PM

Publius commented about

Uncontested Elections: Do You Want to Run?

08/07/2008 11:55 AM

Roy Bauer commented about

District Attorney Clears Chriss Street on All Charges

08/07/2008 11:49 AM

Dan Chmielewski commented about

Save the Date: VP Cheney Headlining Reception for Ken Calvert

08/07/2008 9:17 AM

Randall commented about

Uncontested Elections: Do You Want to Run?

08/07/2008 9:09 AM

Curious commented about

Uncontested Elections: Do You Want to Run?

08/07/2008 9:04 AM

Anonymous commented about

Uncontested Elections: Do You Want to Run?

08/07/2008 8:59 AM

Alexander commented about

Anaheim City Council Race Update

08/07/2008 7:49 AM

Andrew commented about

Anaheim City Council Race Update

08/07/2008 7:27 AM

Adam D. Probolsky commented about

Uncontested Elections: Do You Want to Run?

08/07/2008 7:16 AM

colony rabble commented about

Anaheim City Council Race Update

08/07/2008 7:10 AM

Chino Blanco commented about

Come To Schubert Flint Public Affairs' Open House

08/07/2008 6:53 AM

Dennis commented about

Anaheim City Council Race Update

08/07/2008 6:29 AM

Jennifer commented about

Anaheim City Council Race Update

08/07/2008 6:09 AM

Cody commented about

Anaheim City Council Race Update

08/07/2008 5:46 AM

Categories

1st Supe District Watch (147)
1st Supervisor District (16)
1st Supervisor District Special Election (350)
2006 Races (1)
2007 Wildfires (11)
2008 Elections (79)
241 Tollroad (65)
33rd Senate District (11)
34th Senate District (5)
4th Supervisor District (1)
AD60 Watch (68)
AD71 Watch (103)
AD73 Watch (17)
Add category (1)
AHUSD Special Election Drive (9)
At The Trough (88)
Blogworld Expo 2007 (1)
California Stuff (280)
Carol Rudat (4)
CD46 Watch (16)
CD47 Watch (11)
CUSD Recall (26)
Daily News Roundup - 2008 (160)
Daily News Roundup -- 2007 (309)
Debbie Cook Ballot Title Lawsuit (3)
Erwin Chemerinsky (1)
Fairness Doctrine (1)
FEATURE (30)
Fund 130 Watch (1)
General OC Stuff (64)
Greeniacs (7)
Harkey Agonistes (8)
In re Rachel Home School Ruling (1)
Irvine Mayor's Race (2)
Ladera Peaker Plant (1)
Leftosphere (1)
Liberty (63)
Loretta for Governor (2)
Making of the President (51)
Making of the President 2008 (60)
Measure D (1)
Measure M Renewal (1)
Mike Carona (62)
Monsignor John Urell (13)
National Stuff (53)
Nativo Lopez (1)
News (32)
Nimby Mouse (45)
NIMBY Watch (1)
OC Blogosphere (60)
OC Blogpourri (7)
OC Judge Races (39)
OC Parks (2)
OC Register Website Lameness (2)
OC Sheriff's Department (38)
OC's Next Sheriff (82)
OC/DC (16)
OCTA (20)
Old School (3)
OUSD (9)
Politics Behind the Orange Curtain (483)
Property Rights (14)
Raymond Chandler Quote of the Week (27)
Red County blogs (5)
Red County magazine (3)
Red County Radio (25)
Retroactive Pension Rescission (22)
SD29 Watch (7)
SD33 Watch (97)
SD34 Watch (1)
SD35 Watch (13)
Steve Ambriz (1)
Tan Nguyen (1)
The 3rd Floor (6)
The 5th Floor (143)
The New Majority (3)
The Perils of Chriss Street (28)
The Sheriff's Race (2)
Theo Lacy (1)
TIN CUP 2 (15)
Transportation (30)
Viet Politics (38)