If You Can Make it Here You Can Make it Anywhere?
Posted by: Jonathan Constantine | 02/01/2008 9:45 PM
So says Steve Greenhunt about McCain in his article in the Wall Street Journal. Pointing to his 39 to 26 percent lead over Mitt Romney, Greenhunt notes that the quintessential war hero will dispel any accusations of liberalism if he holds his commanding lead in the Golden State where Republican legislators fall towards "0" on the Americans for Democratic Action's grading scale.
Interesting thesis by Greenhunt, but a bit presumptious without accounting for McCain's inevitability and the anything but Hillary factor. It's hard to believe there is a love affair for McCain, this electorate is just lacking the altruism that rejected Dick Riordan in favor of Bill Simon, and is embracing the politics of the Governator's bias of moderation that muddles prospects for liberal mismanagement.
Interesting thesis by Greenhunt, but a bit presumptious without accounting for McCain's inevitability and the anything but Hillary factor. It's hard to believe there is a love affair for McCain, this electorate is just lacking the altruism that rejected Dick Riordan in favor of Bill Simon, and is embracing the politics of the Governator's bias of moderation that muddles prospects for liberal mismanagement.
McCain's Golden Opportunity
BY STEVEN GREENHUT
February 2, 2008
Santa Ana, Calif.
In presidential primary politics, California is typically good for one thing: raising money. There's plenty of campaign cash to be had in Newport Beach or Hollywood. However, competing for votes in a state that holds its primary long after Iowa and New Hampshire is usually a waste of time.
Not this year. Suddenly, California matters a great deal, as voters head to the polls in nearly two dozen states on Tuesday. The state is especially important for Republicans, who held their final presidential debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., earlier this week.
[John McCain]
For the GOP, it is now a two man race. And the single biggest question plaguing the McCain campaign is this: Can the "maverick" Republican win over conservative voters? Here, in the Golden State, John McCain has an opportunity to definitively answer that question.
Unlike in other states (and California's Democratic Party's primary), independents can't vote in the Republican primary here. The California GOP might be smallish -- 35% of the state's registered voters are Republicans -- but it's solid.
Republican voters here are a lot like their cohorts in more conservative states. Sure, Rudy Giuliani led the polls here before his nationwide collapse, and now Mr. McCain, according to a recent Los Angeles Times poll, holds a 39% to 26% lead over Mr. Romney. But while Mr. McCain is arguably a more "liberal" candidate than Mr. Romney, that's not necessarily the perception among mainstream Republican voters.
Outsiders often point to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a champion of "post-partisan" politics, as the prime example of Left Coast Republicanism. But he is actually a Republican aberration. Mr. Schwarzenegger first won office in an unusual recall election in 2003. He is now disdained by his party for abruptly swinging to the left after his government-reform initiatives were defeated in November 2005. He isn't the product of Republican politics. He was something imposed on the Republican Party.
Thomas A. Fuentes, who led the Orange County GOP from 1984 to 2004, explains it this way: "The conservative nature of the Republican legislators, in both the state Senate and Assembly, more reflects the voices of the party's grassroots in the communities of California [than the views of the governor]. The GOP legislators are at constant loggerheads with the governor. He is a liberal. The legislators are conservative. And, so are the Republican voters."
One leading Republican summed up the governor's influence within his party for me by calling it "a big, fat zero." He tries to be influential -- such as endorsing Mr. McCain. But note the endorsement only came after Mr. McCain took a lead in the polls. Unlike in Florida, where Republican voters were swayed by their governor's endorsement of Mr. McCain, here the governor is following popular Republican opinion, not setting it.
California is a polarized state. Looking at the Americans for Democratic Action's congressional voting record, in other states one finds many members with middle-of-the-road grades. In California, the list is filled with Republican members of Congress who get 0s (the worst grade, in the liberal group's estimation) or maybe 5s or 15s, and Democrats who get 100s, or 90s and 95s.
Among Republicans, "the Reagan magic still is important," explains Shawn Steel, a former state GOP chairman. "There's been no shift to the left among Republicans. Those who are alienated have already left the party." Mr. Steel pointed to some obvious regional differences, though, with northern coastal Republicans more moderate than those in the inland areas and Orange County (still the nation's most Republican large-population county).
The issues, trends and demographics in Republican California are remarkably similar to those in other states. California Republicans are influenced by national trends, explains Doug Kmiec, a professor of constitutional law at Pepperdine University, a former Reagan adviser and current supporter of Mr. Romney. So as Mr. McCain rises elsewhere, he rises here also. National security is a dominant topic in California, home to many large military installations. "Californians like people who served their country in the military and McCain is not shy about reminding people about that service," Mr. Kmiec adds.
The economy is an enormous concern now as Californians are hit by falling home values, but that's happening across the country. Immigration is a "visceral issue" that causes angst among some core Republican voters, but Mr. Kmiec doesn't see it as decisive. News stories will focus on the role of the Latino vote, but most estimates put the percentage of Latino voters at 10% or less of the Republican electorate. That demographic story is a non-issue in California GOP politics.
What it comes down to is this: If Mr. McCain pulls off a win in California, he will do it by competing for support within a conservative Republican base that looks a lot like the Republican Party in red states across the country.
On Super Tuesday, within the closed confines of the GOP primary, traditional Republican voters will choose a nominee based on remarkably typical Republican concerns. That means whoever wins here will likely be able to win among Republicans anywhere.
Mr. Greenhut is a columnist for the Orange County Register in Santa Ana, Calif.
CATEGORY:
Making of the President


Hey man, as a former supporter of Rudy, will you know support McCain since Rudy endorsed him this week?
I like Romney better, but I am not one of those who will not vote for McCain in the general election (ie Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter). The Iraq War is just too important, and I know John McCain wouldn't sell out.
My argument is that the Republican primary here is a primary filled with conservatives. I'm not arguing that McCain -- who is horrible -- is actually a conservative.
Steven,
I agree. But it could be that McCain is also an aberration as you said with Arnold. Like 2003, the Republicans are targeting someone they really dislike in Hillary as they did with Gray Davis. In that sense, it's similar to a recall in that voters are looking retroactively and rejecting the Clinton years.
I'm not sure what Mr. Constantine is saying. Maybe he can elaborate.
Greenhut is clear: "What it comes down to is this: If Mr. McCain pulls off a win in California, he will do it by competing for support within a conservative Republican base that looks a lot like the Republican Party in red states across the country."
Alas and alack, McCain probably will wrap up the nomination Tuesday. But come November, California will go to the Democrat by a million votes. This now is a permanently Blue State.
Nationally, McCain will have four problems winning:
Bush's war.
Bush's inflation.
Bush's $9 trillion debt from big spending.
Bush's recession.
This just isn't a Republican year. Better save your energy and your pesos and plan to take back Congress in 2010 when the Democrat, inevitably, falters like Bill Clinton did in 1994
John,
I am simply saying that if McCain pulls CA (and I believe he will), it will weigh heavily retroactively more than pro-actively. McCain is not a conservative, but neither was Arnold. Gray Davis and HRC are simply too maligned in this whole game to support a candidate who really reflects their beliefs. I really don't think it's a test for McCain or the electorate accepting his domestic political philosophy. It's just pragmatic.
Thanks for the clarification.
This will be a November election, as in 1992 and 1996, when a lot of conservatives stay home and don't vote. Bush Uno and Dole were war heroes, too, but that didn't help them on election day.
Arnold won because he's a Hollywood action movie hero. But when he gets around his wife and other Democrats, he quivers like Barney Fife. Arnold's going to pay for it as the state budget implodes around him the next 3 years. Ha ha ha.
The next four to eight years would be a great time to spend in exile in a capitalist country, like the People's Republic of China.
I get what your saying, but it really doesn't hit the heart of Greenhunt's argument that if McCain get's the nomination it's somehow means that he's won them over.