OC BLOG

 
 

"County Government Is Being Controlled By A Handful Of Republican Thugs"

Posted by: Jubal | 01/29/2008 3:58 PM

The Board of Supervisors is going to vote next week on whether to place the revised TIN CUP ordinance before Orange County voters on the June 2008 ballot. Voters would also decide whether to create an Orange County Fair Campaign Practices Commission (OCFCPC) -- complete with the power to issue subpoenas and compel testimony. This TIN CUP 2 is the creation of Shirley Grindle and Sup. John Moorlach's office.

The point of this commission -- as both Shirley Grindle and Moorlach Chief of Staff Mario Mainero admit -- is to institutionalize Shirley Grindle's avocation in a new government agency.

Think about that for a second.

This Board of Supervisors, which we are regularly told is the most conservative in memory, is poised to expand the scope of county government and further enmesh government in the regulation of political speech, in order to accommodate the wishes of a single individual who is worried no one will carry on her volunteer work after she is gone.

That can be called many things, but conservative is not one of them.

Shirley Grindle devotes all her time to tracking, perusing and dissecting campaign reports. That is her right and she's free to do so until the day she dies. But it's quite a leap to think that somehow obligates the rest of us memorialize Shirley's avocation by infusing her soul into a new government agency. If this is such a good idea, why not simply give Shirley Grindle the right to issue subpoenas and compel testimony? Somehow, I don't think that would draw a lot of support.

"County government is being controlled by a handful of Republican thugs who think they can dictate who runs for office, who gets endorsements, who gets backing. This county government are non-partisan offices and there is entirely too much partisan politics by people in the Republican Party, who know who they are, they know who I'm talking about."
That was Shirley Grindle just two months ago on Channel 4. Do the Supervisors believe they are controlled by "Republican thugs"? Is the Board of Supervisors really prepared to institutionalize that in an enforcement agency?

Comments

Dan Chmielewski said:

Shirley is right of course, in her quote.

TBONE said:

"expand the scope of county government and further enmesh government in the regulation of political speech"

We need to shrink county government, not create another bloated agency. We already all these obese whining cops sucking the government teet until it is chaffed and bleeding with their 100% retirement.

Dan Chmielewski said:

Matt, without this, it just makes it that much easier for politicians to cheat. Since Republicans are so against it, seems to me your side has the most to lose. If its an impediment to free speech, sue. Let the courts sort it out.

Jubal said:

Shirley is right of course, in her quote.

Yeah, sure.

In that case, Dan, I'm sure you have some evidence to back it up: names of those "people," examples of thhose "people" controlling county government and deciding who can run, etc.

Jubal said:

Matt, without this, it just makes it that much easier for politicians to cheat.

Dan, can you cite a problem that this will fix? Is there rampant cheating on county campaign reports?

Since Republicans are so against it, seems to me your side has the most to lose.

As ever, Dan, you are the paradigm of illogic. One does not follow from the other.

If its an impediment to free speech, sue. Let the courts sort it out.

Fabulous. Resort to a lawsuit if one loses the political battle, in order to secure the desired result. That's certainly a grown-up approach. Then again, that is the liberal way.

Cow said:

If this is the kind of "conservative" policy that is coming out of the 5th floor, then why does the OC GOP put so much effort in making sure that it stays all Republicans?

What a joke.

Power corrupts said:

Local ethics commissions are a disaster in every city that has done this: SF, LA, SD, SJ, Ventura County. These commissions are just another agency that searches for a reason to exist. The other reason to exist is to take down high profile candidates or elected officials to prove you are preventing scandal and corruption. So what happens is the ethics commissions began to weigh in on elections and pick winners.

Who watches the watchers?

Anonymous said:

Dan: maybe you can extend the reach of this new commission to Irvine, where a single Democrat "thug" controls the city and the Great Park. Irvine has one of the county's toughest campaign laws and an "ethics" ordinance to boot. In many respects, these regulations have made holding absolute control easier for the Agranistas by making it harder for challengers to compete.

Create a new commission! said:

In order to watch the watchers and prevent them from influencing elections, I suggest we create a new government agency commission. If politics is the problem, more government is the answer!

The Captain said:

Yes, a new commission is just what we need.

If this measure passes, I suggest the

Orange County Fair Campaign Practices Commission Oversight Commission (OCFCPCOC)

- a committee of regular folks designed to ensure that the OCFCPC does not oversteps is bounds and that the OCFCPC actions actually accomplishes its goals.

God help us when the OCFCPCOC needs oversight - we could endup with the OCFCPCOCRC (Orange County Fair Campaign Practices Commission Oversight Commission Regulatory Committee)

Dan Chmielewski said:

If I give you a list of names that most people would agree fit Shirely's description, you'll just refute it with the usually "official/unofficial" jab back. But you're a smart guy and I'm sure you can guess of whom I'm thinking of; as for evidence, there are usually news stories about their shenanigans.

As far as Irvine goes, sunshine is the best disinfectant; by all means use this to investigate the Agranistas. I will also remind you they have been under scrutiny for years.

What problem does it solve Matt? To make sure campaign finance laws are in fact followed.

Jubal said:

If I give you a list of names that most people would agree fit Shirely's description, you'll just refute it with the usually "official/unofficial" jab back.

Weak.

What problem does it solve Matt? To make sure campaign finance laws are in fact followed.

Is there a problem with that serious enough to warrant even more government regulation of political speech? No.

This is about a single individual trying to institutionalize herself and her hobby as a government agency. And I'm shocked that Sup. Moorlach, of all people, is proposing it.

Dan Chmielewski said:

"Weak"

So is your argument that this is a speech issue.

Jubal said:

So is your argument that this is a speech issue.

1) At least I'm offering an argument.

2) It is very much a speech issue. Political speech is more than writing letters to the editor or blogging or standing on a soapbox in a park.

Political speech entails communicating with and persuading your fellow citizens on the issues of the day. Contribution limits inherently limit the ability of candidates and organizations to do so. It costs money to communicate. Arbitrary, government-imposed limits limit political speech.

TIN CUP is only different from its more draconian sibling McCain-Feingold in degree, not kind.

Leave a comment

 

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

 

SPONSORED LINKS

Community: Get Involved

Blogpen Login RSS Feeds Daily Dose
Please Enter Your E-Mail Address


Advertise Here

Comments

Anonymous commented about

AG Jerry Brown To Defend AOCDS From Anti-Retroactive Pension Lawsuit

09/06/2008 9:13 AM

KevinO commented about

Penrose Ballot Issue Settled

09/05/2008 8:15 PM

Anonyms commented about

More Schroeder Amongst The Democrats

09/05/2008 7:50 PM

Andi. W. commented about

McCain Turns In Strong Showing

09/05/2008 5:48 PM

Allan Bartlett commented about

McCain Turns In Strong Showing

09/05/2008 2:31 PM

Been Around commented about

McCain Turns In Strong Showing

09/05/2008 2:21 PM

tylerh commented about

Irvine has a new newspaper. Let's all help!

09/05/2008 2:04 PM

Dan Chmielewski commented about

Ooooooh, barracuda?

09/05/2008 1:52 PM

Coach Ochoa commented about

Orange Street Fair: Day 1

09/05/2008 1:33 PM

Stephanie A. Richer commented about

Ooooooh, barracuda?

09/05/2008 12:12 PM

Dan Chmielewski commented about

Irvine has a new newspaper. Let's all help!

09/05/2008 12:03 PM

Ted Costa commented about

LA Times Releases Unbiased Voter Guide!

09/05/2008 11:44 AM

Daddy CakesĀ® commented about

Enjoying my Favorite Flapjacks with a Few Politicians

09/05/2008 11:21 AM

Philip Keller commented about

Laguna Niguel City Council Election: May the best person win

09/05/2008 10:34 AM

chrisdaines commented about

Penrose Ballot Issue Settled

09/05/2008 10:21 AM

Categories

1st Supe District Watch (149)
1st Supervisor District (19)
1st Supervisor District Special Election (350)
2006 Races (1)
2007 Wildfires (11)
2008 Elections (136)
2010 Elections (1)
241 Tollroad (66)
33rd Senate District (11)
34th Senate District (6)
4th Supervisor District (1)
AD60 Watch (69)
AD71 Watch (103)
AD73 Watch (17)
Add category (1)
AHUSD Special Election Drive (9)
At The Trough (92)
Blogworld Expo 2007 (1)
Buena Park (1)
California Stuff (290)
Carol Rudat (6)
CD46 Watch (19)
CD47 Watch (11)
CUSD Recall (27)
Daily News Roundup - 2008 (181)
Daily News Roundup -- 2007 (309)
Debbie Cook Ballot Title Lawsuit (3)
Erwin Chemerinsky (1)
Fairness Doctrine (1)
FEATURE (36)
Fullerton (3)
Fund 130 Watch (1)
Garden Grove (2)
General OC Stuff (68)
Greeniacs (8)
Harkey Agonistes (8)
In re Rachel Home School Ruling (1)
Irvine Mayor's Race (4)
Ladera Peaker Plant (1)
Leftosphere (2)
Liberty (64)
Loretta for Governor (2)
Making of the President (51)
Making of the President 2008 (67)
Measure D (1)
Measure M Renewal (1)
Mike Carona (62)
Monsignor John Urell (13)
National Stuff (57)
Nativo Lopez (1)
Newport Beach (1)
News (31)
Nimby Mouse (45)
NIMBY Watch (1)
OC Blogosphere (60)
OC Blogpourri (7)
OC Judge Races (40)
OC Parks (2)
OC Register Website Lameness (2)
OC Sheriff's Department (47)
OC's Next Sheriff (83)
OC/DC (17)
OCTA (20)
Old School (4)
OUSD (14)
Politics Behind the Orange Curtain (519)
Property Rights (14)
Raymond Chandler Quote of the Week (28)
Red County blogs (5)
Red County magazine (3)
Red County Radio (25)
Retroactive Pension Rescission (23)
SanTana (4)
SD29 Watch (7)
SD33 Watch (97)
SD34 Watch (1)
SD35 Watch (13)
Steve Ambriz (1)
Tan Nguyen (1)
The 3rd Floor (6)
The 5th Floor (146)
The New Majority (3)
The Perils of Chriss Street (29)
The Sheriff's Race (2)
Theo Lacy (1)
TIN CUP 2 (16)
Transportation (31)
Viet Politics (41)