McCain, Romney and the word "Leader"
Posted by: Media Lizzy | 02/01/2008 12:17 PM
During the Republican debate, held earlier this week at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California, topic number one was the word "Leader." While four candidates shared the stage, only Romney and McCain are viable candidates.
Mitt Romney
argued he embodies the most important qualities of a leader. He led businesses... he
led on economic issues.... when pressed on the issue as it pertains to the role
of Commander in Chief and leading the military, he responded by noting
"I'd loved to have" served. For national security hawks, that answer is woefully insufficient. For socially moderate voters, it reminds them that he chose religious work over military service - and that he may not know how to handle the problems we face in Iraq, Afghanistan, and beyond.
John McCain, on the other
hand, reminds us that he has been a leader since the beginning of his public service career - as a Navy pilot. McCain quickly noted the endorsement of retired General Norman Schwarzkopf and
more than 100 retired generals and admirals. He reminded voters he once commanded
the largest naval squadron - which was about more than strategy - it's managing a multi-million dollar budget that derives its income from American taxpayers. Four former secretaries of state have
endorsed him, including two of Ronald Reagan's fellas.
I am a national security freak. I think about SGLI. The GI Bill.
Survivors benefits and DIC (Death Indemnity Compensation) and Veterans
health care. I think of my visits to Section 65, Marker 3618 in
Arlington National Cemetery. I think of the quiet ceremony on the
afternoon of September 11, 1998 at the Old Post Chapel where old
friends gathered. Today, many of them are still in uniform -
fighting on the front lines as Commanding Officers. Like John McCain, they are now engaged in a real war, with real lives at stakes.
Mitt Romney can say he is a leader. But it doesn't make it true.
Lately, I have been asking myself, which of the Republicans do I trust with the day-to-day life of today's soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines??? Does Mitt Romney have any idea what it's like to experience sudden, catastrophic loss and still bear the responsibility of being the face & force for strength? Does John McCain?
Do Domestic issues matter? Yes. But, if we are not safe - then nothing else matters. Electing a president who understands how to manage the entire portfolio is difficult at best.
As a Gold Star Wife, I don't trust Mitt Romney on the national security and military issues that matter most to me. He does not have the cultural understanding necessary to be Commander in Chief. He displays very little intellectual power during discussions of Iraq, Iran, or any foreign policy matter. The Commander in Chief can't just call attorneys to decipher the UCMJ. The Commander in Chief should have real info - not just know where the best offshore tax havens are.
For me, despite my differences with him on a couple of domestic issues - the best candidate in the Republican primary is John McCain. McCain runs his own ship. I don't know what date MCain's "Alive Day" is - but I know that he has one. It leaves a mark in your very soul. Grace follows the Alive Day, and a palpable understanding of sacrifice stays in your mind. And it's the kind of day that makes it possible to survive five years of torture. It is the kind of experience that steadies a Commander in Chief as the nation weathers war - and faces an era where the enemy is elusive.
Finally - when it comes to the social issues, let me be very clear. I will not accept morality lessons from "movement conservatives" who have friends under indictment, in jail, in disgrace, that solicit House pages for sex, or align themselves with hookers, madams, or claim to have a wide stance. John McCain is more of a real man than all of those people put together. They are only one-third of the GOP - that isn't a base - that is the Fringe.
If I needed investment advice, I'd call Romney. If it's anything else - vote McCain in the Republican primary.
--Media Lizzy









Very well said Media Lizzy. I've been trying to convey a similar message to some folks on this blog but it didn't come out as convincing as your argument on why John McCain is the most qualified and electable candidate we have to take on Hillary.
I don't know why you people can't get it through your thick heads. McCain was strong on the war, he is as weak as Hillary on national security.
McCain's has done NOTHING to stem the flow of illegal immigrants into this country.
McCain is against interrogating known terrorists to protect Amercian lives.
McCain believes in giving up US sovereignty to the UN.
McCain has increased our demand for foreign oil in opposing drilling in ANWR.
If you insist on a President that will destroy my country, I prefer it be a Democrat.
Obama has already started using McCain's own words against him. If both the GOP and the Dem nominee campaign for higher taxes - what's the difference?
If they both campaign for $5 a gallon gas in the name of the environment - what's the difference?
Obama drilled McCain to rousing applause in the debate the other night.
Fox News shows that McCain is down to either Hillary or Obama...
It is awful hard to get elected President when you have been slapping the faces of the base of your own party for 8 years.
Like many Republicans, I differ with John McCain on several issues. I wasn't thrilled about the Gang of 14 but, I also wasn't real thrilled that former Majority Leader Bill Frist was such a weak leader that made the Gang of 14 necessary.
Saddling McCain with the problems caused by the consistently weak leaders in the US Congress is an incredible, unhelpful position that further illuminates why Republicans lost their majority in the US Senate, US House, a majority of Governors, statewide constitutional officers and state legislatures.
Corruption and hypocrisy of "conservative" leaders caused the problems of today. Not John McCain.
Conservatives like Tom DeLay and Denny Hastert and Larry Craig and David Vitter and Duke Cunningham and Jack Abramoff and Ralph Reed and many, many others are the reason the Republican brand has been damaged. Conservatives refuse to take responsibility for their actions, and they expect the rest of the Republican party to continue on - giving them the keys to the Republican National Committee?
Absolutely not. The other two-thirds of the Republican Party owes them nothing.
John McCain's integrity, despite the protestations of the corrupt base, is intact, He alone, among republicans, possesses the ability to draw independents and conservative democrats in the November election.
If Republicans want to win - not just "be right" - then John McCain is the answer. He possesses the foreign policy gravitas necessary. He has never sponsored an earmark - and can hold the line on out of control spending with authenticity. He understands that Americans are at our best when we embody humane policies that advance equality, rather than stifle it.
McCain wins, hands down.