GOP Support for Scozzafava Endangers Grassroots Efforts

By Bryan Myrick | 10/22/09 | 02:39 PM EDT | 8 Comments

Latest national commentaries

more »

When, at the end of September, Rep. John McHugh (R) resigned as the congressman from New York’s 23rd District to become Secretary of the Army it represented an opportunity for the Republican party. The off-year special election to fill McHugh’s seat — set by New York Governor David Paterson to be held on November 3rd, to coincide with the scheduled general election – is the closest thing to a preseason game the GOP will get in preparation for the 2010 midterm elections that many analysts feel are vital both to the future of the party and our nation. By choosing Deidre “Dede” Scozzafava, the party of Reagan has — in basketball terms — thrown up a golden 3-point shot, but at the wrong basket.

Scozzafava, who currently represents District 122 to the New York State Assembly, is what you would see when looking up RINO (Republican In Name Only) if an American encyclopedia of political zoology were to exist. If the GOP selected its nominees the way that eHarmony identifies potential soul mates, her pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, and pro-card check positions alone would almost certainly have returned a response of ‘incompatible.’

The list of those endorsing Scozzafava is, to put it politely, eclectic, and includes:

  • the Wish List, a PAC devoted to electing pro-choice Republicans the House and Senate
  • Markos Moulitsas Zúñiga, founder and published of the Daily Kos
  • the Working Families Party, a self-identified “progressive political party” that has close ties to scandal-wracked ACORN

[Shame on Newt Gingrinch and House Minority Leader John Boehner for their support as well.]

Were Scozzafava’s status as a Republican solid, some of us who look at the chess board and recognize that there is safety in numbers might see the wisdom in party luminaries backing a candidate even if they do reject so many of the GOP’s core principles. But when New York Democratic party chair June O’Neill reveals that Scozzafava’s husband was pimping her out as a Democrat-in-waiting shortly before she accepted the Republican nomination, the “R” beside her name looks more like an accessory that might be changed depending on her mood. From the New York Daily News:

Her husband spoke with several Democratic officials and, you know, people who are aligned with the Democratic Party,” O’Neill said. “There was some discussion about whether or not Dede might switch parties…

According to O’Neill, this isn’t the first time the Democrats have spoken to Scozzafava about switching sides.

Furthermore, it is painfully ironic that after months of scathing criticism from GOP leadership regarding the Obama administration’s conga line of of tax cheats, and the White House’s nonexistent vetting process for high-level staff and appointment, Red State’s reporting in July that three of Scozzafava’s companies had a total of $192,000 in outstanding tax liens.

Current polling indicates that Scozzafava is splitting the Republican vote with Doug Hoffman, who sought the GOP nomination early on but on losing to Scozzafava picked up the banner of the Conservative Party of New York. The Democratic party nominee Bill Owens, leads in the latest polls by a slim margin. In the two consecutive polls, taken less than three weeks apart by Siena Research Institute, only Scozzfava has been losing ground while her two opponents have made significant gains.

Date Dierdre Scozzafava (R) Doug Hoffman (Cons) Bill Owens (D)
10/15/2009
Source: Siena Research Institute
29% 23% 33%
9/29/2009
Source: Siena Research Institute
35% 16% 28%


Hoffman has almost certainly benefited from the endorsement of prominent conservatives such as Michelle Malkin, Bill Kristol, Rush Limbaugh, former Sen. Fred Thompson, as well as groups like the American Conservative Union and the Club for Growth. They are only a subset of the list of the third party candidate’s supporters.

No matter what the vote tally indicates on November 3rd, continued support for Scozzafava by establishment Republicans will send a chill through the ranks of only recently awakened conservative grass roots networks. Now is the time for Republican strategists to consider drawing up escape routes for Scozzafava’s withdrawal from the race or for the GOP to distance themselves from the candidate.  The potential sea change that could manifest from the mixture of an invigorated choir of conservative voices and growing disillusionment about President Obama’s radical left-wing agenda will be made monumentally more difficult if morale is low in the conservative base during these critical fundraising months. It is time for the captains of conservatism in the Republican party to steer the ship into the fight, instead of sailing away to fight another day.

*EDITOR'S NOTE: Help out the true conservative in this race, Doug Hoffman, by visiting his website and contributing to his campaign: DougHoffmanforCongress.com. He will need all the resources he can get in these last days before the election!

 

Print | Email | Share
 

8 Comments | Related Topics »National

 

Comments

 
Great points here, Bryan. The

Great points here, Bryan. The grass roots activists have worked far too hard to have the GOP throw in with a "squish" like Dede.

Submitted by Bill on Thu, 10/22/09 - 01:09 PM » | Print
 
 
The NRCC got this one wrong.

The NRCC got this one wrong. It would be better to have the Democrat win this seat.

Submitted by Shannon on Thu, 10/22/09 - 01:11 PM » | Print
 
 
If the GOP is to ever regain

If the GOP is to ever regain the trust of voters, they need strong candidates. Dede does not fit the bill.

Submitted by Daryl on Thu, 10/22/09 - 01:13 PM » | Print
 
 
I've lived in New York and

I've lived in New York and this is a tough one. It's tough for conservative candidates to get elected here. However, not sure Dede represents what New Yorkers are looking for.

Submitted by Matthew on Thu, 10/22/09 - 01:15 PM » | Print
 
 
Hoffman is a much better fit

Hoffman is a much better fit for the 23rd. I agree with all of this.

Submitted by Lynn on Thu, 10/22/09 - 01:16 PM » | Print
 
 
Thank You Kevin McCarthy

These are the kinds of Candidates he has been recruiting - more of the same values that got the GOP fired in 2006 and 2008.

The Moral to this story: Never give a dime to the NRCC only give to the candidates (or PAC's that have endorsed the ones you believe in)

Submitted by Sgt. York on Thu, 10/22/09 - 01:16 PM » | Print
 
 
Dateline: Washington, November 3, 2010

AP - Republicans Lose Seats, Conservative Party Fails to Win Any; Election Outcome Unsurprising

Political analysts don't need a crystal ball to understand why the GOP was unable to regain seats in the House and the Senate yesterday despite the historical success of the party out of power in the White House to do well in mid-term elections.  Most believe that yesterday's predictable blood bath - a net loss of three Senate seats and eighteen in the House - was due to the refusal of the ideological right wing of the party to move off of outdated positions that no longer align with the vast majority of American opinion.  This split in the GOP resulted in over thirty House races featuring a Conservative Party candidate in addition to someone on the Republican ticket.  In these races no Republican who was not the incumbent was able to win the race, and no Conservative Party candidate won anywhere.  On the Senate side two races were decided when the conservative vote was split between a Republican and a Conservative Party candidate; Democrats won overwhelming victories in Kentucky and South Carolina, once Republican strongholds.

In related news, RNC Chair Michael Steele announced his resignation, and the Conservative Party announced through it's spokesman, Sean Hannity, that it will be back again in 2012.  "Some people never learn", said potential 2012 Republican presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty, finally breaking his long silence regarding the obvious schism dividing his party.  "This is no way to restore conservative leadership in the United States."

Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 10/22/09 - 03:22 PM » | Print
 
 
Your premise is faulty, lacks

Your premise is faulty, lacks merit, and is based in old-style politics that are no longer relevant in America today.

 

 

Submitted by Baba O'Reilly on Fri, 10/23/09 - 02:49 PM » | Print
 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.