Profile | JL "Buzz" Aguirre
Website | The CotoBuzz Journal
» Follow Me on Twitter
» My Facebook
Author's Latest Posts |
- Real News, Lap Dogs, Watchdogs or Talk Shows?
- "First Real Afghanistan Strategy" Has Been Costly
- Constitutionality of New FTC Blogger Rules Questioned
- OCSD Priorities- A new Desk for Mr. Burris
- 85 Troops Die Since McChrystal’s Request
More»
"First Real Afghanistan Strategy" Has Been Costly
By JL "Buzz" Aguirre | 10/19/09 | 04:20 PM EDT | 6 Comments
Recently Secretary of Defense Robert Gates asserted that the Afghanistan strategy unveiled March 2009 was the first real strategy in the last eight years. An interesting comment considering that Secretary Gates served as Defense Secretary in the Bush administration when he replaced Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in January 2007. One can only wonder what Secretary Gate’s contribution was between the time he replaced Secretary Rumsfeld and March 2009.
In an interview with CNN Secretary Gates said: "I will tell you, I think that the strategy the president put forward in late March, is the first real strategy we have had for Afghanistan since the early 1980s."
Also interesting is the fact that General McChrystal, hand-picked to implement the real Afghanistan strategy and characterized by Secretary Gates as having "tremendous" skills and the "fresh thinking" required to implement the strategy, as of September had only spoken once to the President. So much for fresh thinking, or so much for a war-time commander in Chief?
Additionally, General McChrystal’s request for additional troops to implement the real strategy is being second-guessed by professional politicians such as Vice-President Joe Biden, who is diametrically opposed to Gen. McChrystal's recommendations. Since Gen. McChrystal’s request and as of this writing, the President has attended at least five high-level strategic reviews of the war in Afghanistan. Does this mean that the real strategy is, well.... unreal?
At the end of last month, NATO's Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen assured President Obama that the war in Afghanistan is a team effort – but refused to pledge additional forces.
Last week, UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown said Britain would send the additional troops as long as certain conditions were met, including Kabul agreeing to provide Afghan troops to be trained and fight alongside British forces and that the increase in British numbers also had to be part of an agreed approach with other military forces in Afghanistan, with all countries bearing their fair share. The number of troops in question? 500 , or a puny 1% of the troops requested by Gen McChrystal.. In other words, PM Brown echoes Rasmussen’s pledge: The war is a team effort – the US provides the effort, NATO provides the conditions.
What is MChrystal clear is that 107 allied troops have died since Gen. McChrystal requested additional troops to implement the first real strategy - and the General continues to wait, and wait, and wait......for high-level scrutiny of the real Afghanistan strategy.
6 Comments | Related Topics »National
RECOMMENDED SITES
















Comments
Gates is an idiot for making this statement. We routed the Taliban in short order under the previous administration.
- reply
|Secretary Gates may be everything but an idiot. If anything, he is a survivor - the consummate politician. Now wonder the least trusted professions is that of a lawyer/politician.
- reply
|I really find it hard to believe that Gates would have made that statement. It's a slap in the face to the troops who served there over the past 8 years. Politics trumps reason.
- reply
|As you say, it is not only hard to believe, but also an insult to the troops. Were it not for an independent media, there would not be a way to confirm that what the Secretary said was actually said....and that of course is next - eliminate the independent media.
Guess what the explanation is going to be, if one is demanded and provided? "Comments taken out of context"!- reply
|I really don't know the solution in Afghanistan. But I just have to think that to get any stability we need to eliminate the obscene drug profits funding the terrorists. Since decriminalization is not going to happen, I wonder if we salted all of the fields used for poppy production if we could cut off the money supply.
Anyhow, I really don't have a clue. All I know is that I don't think there was a fourth Punic War.
- reply
|Indeed - this is not easy, but the right solution requires commitment, decisiveness and perseverance. However, when the views on the war range from counter-terrorism to counter-intelligence and everything in between, the "real strategy" is indeed unreal. Remember that the global War on Terror was legislated to be non-existent. Whether the words are calibrated or not, decision-making in this issues is wallowing in the never, never nebulosities of open ended possibilities.
- reply
|Post new comment