Does Beth Krom Have a Chance?

By Tyler Holcomb | 06/30/09 | 12:05 PM EDT | 7 Comments

Latest posts from your county...

more »

A major fundraising milestone looms for Beth Krom: she needs to raise $250,000 by the end of this month. Can she raise that much? and if she does, will it matter? As I explain in detail below, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC)  is unlikely to consider Beth a serious contender unless she can also mobilize a new voting block.

The standard way to assess a congressional seat's competitiveness is the Cook Partisan Voting Index.  CD 48 currently has a CPVI +6R, meaning that past voting patterns suggest a generic, non-incumbent Republican should beat a generic non-incumbent Democrat by 6 points. Since Beth is facing a well-financed incumbent, CD-48 is generally considered "non-competitive."   CPVI matters.  Consider two recent examples here in Southern California: CD-46 has a CPVI of +6R, and Debbie Cook lost by 11 points to Dana Rohrbacher in 2008.  CD-50 has CPVI +3R, and Francine Busby lost by 10 points to Brian Bilbray in 2006.

Beth not only faces an unfavorable CPVI, she also faces a well-financed incumbent and a hideously expensive media market.  Thus the DCCC will take a "show me" approach to Beth's candidacy.  As in, "Show me that you've got something special to make this a real race." 

The DCCC are no fools when it comes to their own money.  They know that in 2008 over 95% of incumbents were re-elected. Moreover, most of the successful challengers had the CPVI leaning their way.  Only seven out nineteen successful challengers overcame a CPVI of +5 or more in 2008.

A close look at the seven races in which the CPVI was overcome illustrates what it would take for Beth to win. In four races the incumbents were badly wounded:  William "Freezer" Jefferson and the Tom "Abramoff" Feeney were tainted by nationally-publicized scandals, while Bill Sali in Idaho and Marilyn Musgrave in Colorado were so publicly toxic that their own party establishment abandoned them. In Sali's case, prominent Idaho Republicans endorsed the Democrat. The remaining three upsets were Virginia's 2nd District (22% Black), Virginia's 5th District (24% Black), and North Carolina's 8th District (27% Black), where Obama had strong coattails.

These 2008 results suggest that in order to overcome her CPVI deficit and get support from the DCCC Beth needs one or more of the following:

(1)  Campbell to make the national news with a major scandal, or

(2)  Campbell to alienate the Republican Party to the degree that prominent Republicans endorse Beth, or

(3)  a large, pro-Democratic voting block to turn out in unusually high numbers.

So far, Campbell shows no signs of alienating the Republican Party nor obliging the Democrats with a scandal.  Beth will need to mobilize a new voting block in order to be taken seriously. Since CD 48 is only 2% black, finding this heretofore unknown voting block will require some serious creativity

Beth Krom, like successful fundraisers Debbie Cook and Francine Busby, a is long shot.

 

TAGS: irvine beth krom cd48

 

Print | Email | Share
 

7 Comments | Related Topics »Orange County (CA)

 

Comments

 
I'd feel bad for Beth Krom

...if John Campbell weren't such a conservative stud. 

Submitted by Charlie Rice on Tue, 06/30/09 - 08:34 PM » | Print
 
 
Simply answer. Heck NO!!

Simply answer. Heck NO!!

Submitted by themarshallplan on Wed, 07/01/09 - 12:25 AM » | Print
 
 
Great analysis Tyler

But I long for the day when the black vote won't be assumed to go democrat.

MLK was a republican you know. 

Submitted by Eric Hall on Wed, 07/01/09 - 10:42 AM » | Print
 
 
Krom has a chance, but it is long shot

The Cook Partisan Voting Index (PVI) might be fun to look at but it it's methodology is flawed and Wikepedia, as a source, does lend it credibility. See:  http://www.congressmatters.com/storyonly/2009/2/12/534/-Introducing:-A-New-and-Improved-Voting-Index.

I agree however with your article that in order for Krom to be taken seriously, she must immediately demonstrate significant fundraising ability and bi-partisan political appeal. Campbell is entrenched and nothing but an all-out assualt will over-turn this seat. However, The Obama affect, the trending in OC polling for the administration's policies, the declining economic situation and Campbell's failure to bring home $$ from the stimulus will all work to Krom's advantage. She will however have to seriously drive up his negatives and peel away his financial (literally the financial sector) support and political base. 

Krom's voting record on economic and business issues as Irvine Mayor and her very strong public safety record (Irvine was regularly named safest city in America by the FBI under her leadership) will serve her well as she fights for movable Repub's and Independents in the District. 

This will be an uphill fight all way for Krom and she will need national and big-money support from groups like the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC). The several quarters will determine her viability in this race.

Submitted by Citizen Kane on Wed, 07/01/09 - 02:29 PM » | Print
 
 
I could just be naive...

...but I wouldn't be surprised if Campbell's record of not bringing home stimulus money may actually help him in the conservative district. 

Submitted by Charlie Rice on Wed, 07/01/09 - 04:31 PM » | Print
 
 
Not a chance!

Beth's only real experience in fundraising has been through illegal in-kind campaign contributions and illegal excess campaign contributions (both in excess of Irvine's campaing contribution limits) orchestrated through the Hometown Voter Guide a.k.a. Larry.  This experience of accepting illegal excess campaign contributions won't be available to prop up her candidacy in this race and she won't be able to push her campaign forward. 

Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 07/01/09 - 02:36 PM » | Print
 
 
Tyler -- Krom's fundraising

Tyler -- Krom's fundraising efforts are way ahead of where Steve Young was at this stage of the game.  If she doesn't make her goal for the quarter, I'll remind you how hard it is to raise money while grieving for her son Noah especially with the hocket stick effect of end fo the quarter fundraising.  I think Noah's death means a re-evaluation of fundraising goals. 

A big different between Krom and Campbell; most of her funds are from inidivdual voters.  Most of his from PACs.

Meanwhile, Campbell hasn't brought a dime back tot he district and still has to explain his vote to bailout the auto industry for principled conservatives everywhere.  You can't have it both ways

Submitted by Dan Chmielewski on Wed, 07/01/09 - 04:51 PM » | Print
 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 17 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.