Profile | Americans for Tax Reform
Website | www.ATR.org
Author's Latest Posts |
- Healthcare Bill Breaks Obama's Oft-Repeated Promise on Taxes
- Government Healthcare: Everyone is Equal, Some More Equal Than Others
- Cap and Trade: Price Controls Don't Exist in a Rational Market
- "Stimulus" Job Numbers Greatly Exaggerated
- White House Spins Redistribution Scheme as Tax Cut
More»
Cutting Drug Costs Without Government Mandates
By Americans for Tax Reform | 06/28/09 | 12:35 PM EDT | 4 Comments
There's a lot of fast and loose numbers thrown around in Washington these days when it comes to health care. It seems like every other day, President Obama and health industry leaders are pulling some "magic asterisk" out of the air, and claiming to have "cut" real health dollars. When you get past the headline, you find it's more fluff than substance.
Until now.
This week, PhRMA announced that they would be cutting name-brand drug prices in half for many seniors. Under Medicare "Part D," seniors face heavily subsidized drug coverage for the first few thousand dollars in annual drug spending, and when they have a very large prescription drug bill. However, there is a coverage gap in between those two subsidies that many have called the "donut hole." In this "donut hole," seniors are left to pick up the tab for their medicines. It's in this coverage gap that PhRMA is cutting drug prices in half.
Notice what you don't see there. You don't see a government bureaucrat "negotiating" with drug companies. You don't see a price control bill passed by Congress. What you do see is an industry doing well by doing good. They know that happy customers are consistent customers, and there is a perceived customer relations issue with this coverage gap. So, like any group of companies, they are making their customers feel better about buying their product.
Now, suppose the government had stormed in and demanded this. At that point, PhRMA would have to protect the interests of member companies and shareholders, and would need an adversarial stance against the federal "negotiators." Seniors would have ended up with a far worse deal.
There's nothing wrong with our healthcare system that can't be solved by the government just getting out of the way.
4 Comments | Related Topics »National
RECOMMENDED SITES















Comments
Government interference in the heathcare industry will be the demise of the best medical care in the world.
- reply
|Obamacare is coming, in one version or another. Remember your last trip to the DMV? Future visits to the doctor may run just as smoothly and efficiently.
- reply
|Obamacare will become a reality and we will be no better than Canada in terms of medical care.
- reply
|Government has never seen a program it didn't like, or want to control. With a few exceptions on both sides of the aisle, most in Congress have never had a real job, had to meet a payroll, compete for a market share or actually deal with employees. Some actually go to Congress with good intentions. They are then cast into the snake pit and before you say, "Satan get thee behind me" they fall prey to lobbyists, special interests and other members who have already sold their souls. With this influence, how can the taxpayer possibly expect to win? Soon our new representative is brain washed and part of the power trip in Congress. Despite failure after failure; including Social Security, Medcare, Veterans Care, Immigration and Border Control, etc., they continue to seek to expand their span of control. Think I am stretching the truth? Just look at the recent six months as additional reinforcement. Congress are now experts in Banking, Auto Manufacturing, Insurance and the Housing Market. Previews of comming attractons include; a major government involvement in the Cap & Trade Energy Process, where most elected officals don't even know what is in the bill. And not to forget Obamarama Universal Healthcare. Now, if this isn't representation at it's worst, please tell me what is?
- reply
|Post new comment