Constitutionality of New FTC Blogger Rules Questioned

By JL "Buzz" Aguirre | 10/17/09 | 09:05 PM EDT | 4 Comments

Latest national commentaries

more »

Are the new Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) blogger rules just another White House attempt at trampling the US Constitution? Apparently the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) seems to think so. Not only that, but the IAB thinks that the White House-friendly media gets Constitutional protection, while the new media is discriminated against. The FTC's guidelines are set to go into effect at the beginning of December 2009.

The practices have long been afforded strong First Amendment protections in traditional media outlets, but the Commission is saying that the same speech deserves fewer Constitutional protections online”, reads in part an open letter to FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz by Randall Rothenberg, the President and CEO of the IAB. In the letter, IAB calls the FTC’s distinction between offline media and online media, "constitutionally dubious…. What concerns us the most in these revisions is that the Internet, the cheapest, most widely accessible communications medium ever invented, would have less freedom than other media" Rothenberg said.

I urge the Commission to retract the current set of Guides and to commence a fair and open process in order to develop a road map by which responsible online actors can engage with consumers and continue to provide the invaluable content and services that have so transformed people’s lives" Rothenberg added.

And just like the Health Care legislation, the new guidelines appear to be written by attorneys for attorneys. Considerer that the new FTC guidelines contain a number of gray areas which makes it difficult for bloggers to determine exactly what a sponsored post is. These areas include several categories such as : Access, incentive, thank you, product demonstration, advertising/editorial, paid reviews, junk and pay to play. Then there is the issue of character restrictions, such as Twitter. Some say that disclosure on Twitter is impossible. Is hashtag like #ad is enough, for instance?

What is required for now is a suspension of disbelief on constitutionality of the new FTC Blogger Rules.

TAGS: FTC, Free Speech, 1st Amendment, US Constitution, Bloggers

 

Print | Email | Share
 

4 Comments | Related Topics »National

 

Comments

 
More free speech restraints

More free speech restraints courtesy of the Democrats.

Submitted by Kelly on Sun, 10/18/09 - 01:05 PM » | Print
 
 
But Wait- there is more

It is much more than that - while the Chearleader in the media is exulted, the responsible one is vilified - refer to the Fox which Ate the Peacock, for example

Submitted by cotobuzz on Sun, 10/18/09 - 02:32 PM » | Print
 
 
Hold Democrats Accountable

Good article Coto!

Let's see, how does this work? The Democrats create all these restraints in order to shut people up, and then, when they find that they too must live by the SAME rules, decide they will recind the law??? 

American news already appears to be heavily censored; most Americans are getting the real news from foreign news sources. My question now, as it was in the past, and will be tomorrow:  WHEN WILL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WAKE UP?

Submitted by SHERMAN TANK on Sun, 10/18/09 - 03:55 PM » | Print
 
 
Good Point

You have a good point.  There seems to be  concious and systematic attempt by lawmakers to stiffle dissent, including Speaker Pelosi's Shut Up Rule:http://www.atwebo.com/cotobuzz/2009/JOURNALISM/CotoJOURNALISM-S448.htm

Not to mention the vilified manufactured protesters aka as the well attired seniors and or the MOB

Submitted by cotobuzz on Sun, 10/18/09 - 10:50 PM » | Print
 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.