Profile | Warner Todd Huston
Website | Publius' Forum
» Follow Me on Twitter
» My Facebook
Author's Latest Posts |
- No One Gains Full Confidence in Top of Ticket Races
- Dems Troubled Lt. Gov Candidate Drops Out
- Chicago's Mayor Daley Says Scott Lee Cohen Earned His Election
- State GOP Thanks Candidates
- Ill. GOP Chair Pat Brady: 'Illinois is Next!'
More»
Carly Fiorina: A Viable Choice for Golden State Voters
By Warner Todd Huston | 10/12/09 | 07:45 PM EDT | 17 Comments
Cary Fiorina, former Hewlett-Packard CEO and probable candidate for U.S. Senate from California, is starting to look like a viable choice for conservative voters in the Golden State, giving the GOP two conservatives from whom to chose.
Fiorina's bona fides have been a question to many California Republicans because she is a relative newcomer to politics and many are not familiar with her political philosophy or what her campaign will stand for. But her recent hard hitting editorial in the Fresno Bee helps bring her ideals better into focus for the voters.
Fiorina's editorial in the Bee focuses on the water controversy of the San Joaquin Valley. As many know, a federal bureaucracy has summarily shut off water to thousands of acres of farmland merely in order to save a fish; the delta smelt. This enviro-activism has shut down thousands of acres of farmland and put thousands of residents out of work. Down the line it will also negatively affect the nation's food supply because the San Joaquin Valley supplies much of our vegetables and fruits.
Devin Nunes (R-Tulare) recently said that the water crisis is a man made one.
Here is the truth about federal water regulations that are cutting our local water supplies in the name of saving endangered fish: We are being punished for pollution entering the water system as far north as Sacramento and beyond, as well as for the predatory bass and other stressors beyond our area's control.
So this situation is a volatile one pitting environmentalists against workers of the Valley. It would be easy for a candidate to soft sell a stance on this issue in an attempt to satisfy both the fish lovers out there and the residents that are losing their livelihoods. Fiorina, however, came out strong in her position.
Fiorina is unequivocal on her stance: the water should be turned on regardless of what it is doing to the fish. Of her fact finding trip to the Valley, Fiorina said:
The day began with a visit to a local farm and a thorough briefing by water and agriculture experts. They provided a realistic assessment of the ill-considered actions that have literally turned off the spigot and prevented farmers from getting the water necessary to put their land into production.
She agreed with Senator Dianne Feinstein for supporting a federal study to investigate California's water crisis, but said that the water should not be shut off during this study period.
Pragmatism calls for a solution that provides economic relief to a devastated region. It continues with a review and improvement of the science as Sen. Feinstein has recommended.
Ideology should not triumph over common sense and compassion. Leaders in our state and nation should focus on our top priority -- jobs and opportunity.
Clearly Fiorina is promulgating a strong conservative principle here. It seems likely that conservatives will find much to like about Fiorina's stance at least on this issue.
In the meantime, Barbara Boxer voted against this sort of solution by turning down Senator Jim DeMint's amendment that would temporarily return the water to the Valley as the situation is studied. Boxer's solution is to allow the harm to the Valley's delicate economy to continue while bureaucrats dither and ponder the lives of fish.
Still, Fiorina has a long way to go -- including making her campaign official and not just exploratory -- before she is a lock. To be sure Chuck DeVore, an announced Republican candidate for Senate (chuckdevore.com/), has been in the race for some time unlike Fiorina who is still in the exploratory phase of her effort. A recent poll pitting DeVore against Fiorina finds respondents rating the two nearly even. The poll also shows greater than half the respondents are undecided, however, and both candidates seem to have an uphill battle against incumbent Democrat Barbara Boxer, with Fiorina having a slight advantage over DeVore on this count.
It is clear that both Fiorina and DeVore have a ways to go to convince California's Republican voters that they are the right choice. Fiorina in particular has a lot of work to do if she is to convince voters that she is the right choice. This trip and editorial should help reveal her viability. She has launched a website, though like many, I am not a big fan of it and it's sort of hokey kicker line: "Carlyfornia Dreamin!!!" (yes, it does have all three exclamation marks). But let's not mark a candidate by how cool her website is, shall we?
Finally, I can't resist this. I just have to show you DeVore's great ad displaying the ill-tempered Barbara Boxer:
And let's be clear here. No matter who the Republicans pick as a candidate for Senate, This, Boxer, is what they face.
TAGS: Carly Fiorina, Senate, Chuck DeVore, California, 2010
17 Comments | Related Topics »CALIFORNIA | National
RECOMMENDED SITES
















Comments
I like Carly. She has real world experience and she is sharp.
Carly? No thanks. I'm with DeVore. Not sure either if either one has a snowball chance in the general but it will sure be interesting to watch. The Democrats are in for a bumpy ride in 2010.
You are quite right about that, April!
when there is a candidate with a great record and political experience available in Chuck Devore. Why is she preferred to him?
Who said she IS "preferred" to DeVore? I didn't say anywhere in the piece that she is better than DeVore or that he is better than she. This report merely gives kudos to a good piece that might help illuminate her position on things for the voters to make a decision.
I just don't understand why Fiorina has such a greater blessing from Republicans
Madam, stay in the corporate world. You don't have what it takes to be out there and as a conservative mom, i will not vote for you. Your connection to McCain is unacceptable....sorry but you just ain't got it.
Warner - the fact that the same people that brought us Arnold, the electoral disasters in 2006,2008 and now Meg Whitman are also bringing us Fiorina is causing me to choke.
Unlike you, I think Fiorina could beat Boxer - I don't think DeVore could. Money - not ideaology is the issue. But the thought of having Fiorina as the top Republican in the state given who would be pulling her strings is a problem. (I see US Sentae as higher rank than Governor)
Wait, what do you mean "unlike you, I think Fiorina could beat Boxer"? When did I say she could or couldn't beat Boxer? You are mistaken to think that I have taken a side between Fiorina and DeVore. I have not. In fact, I am one of those that gets upset when the NRSC comes in ahead of time and tries to pick the candidate for the state before the voters even get a chance to chose in a primary! Again, this piece is NOT choosing sides at all. It is merely reporting that Fiorina did a good job with her Op Ed. Focus people, focus.
"The poll also shows greater than half the respondents are undecided, however, and both candidates seem to have an uphill battle against incumbent Democrat Barbara Boxer, with Fiorina having a slight advantage over DeVore on this count." --- I 100% agree with your antipathy for the NRSC, they are losers.
Seriously, THAT is your proof that I said Fiorina is the better? All I said is that the poll showed she had a slight lead at this point in time! I didn't make any judgment on what the poll means for the future only that right this second she has a slight advantage. Whether she keeps that advantage... who knows?
For more on the story of the drought, and the lack of common sense among politicians regarding water resources, read Max Schulz's piece in the September issue of The American Spectator (TAS).
The title of the article is, "Emptying Reservoirs in the Middle of a Drought." Go to www.spectator.org. for good details on this story of the struggling farmers in one of the most important agricultural regions of the country.
The federal study proposed by Sen. Feinstein was her attempt to appear to be doing something to solve the Central Valley water problem without actually doing anything to solve it. A study conducted by the National Academy of Sciences will take years to complete. By that time, thousands more farmers will be out of work and there is no guarantee the study will turn the water back on.
Is this the kind of thing we can expect from Carly Fiorina if she's elected to the Senate? Since when do conservatives support spending $750,000 studying a problem for which there is already a solution? Carly should focus more on promoting good policies and less on being bipartisan.
<!--Session data-->Save the $750,000 federal study, and TURN ON THE PUMPS.
Soooo, why I should vote for the person that "tanked" HP?
Carly was fired from HP and passed over for promotion at AT&T because she was incompetent.
Please send her back to New Jersey!
I don't care who the Republicans run, but they better find someone who is conservative and can win. Barbara Boxer is like trying to communicate with a tree knot. I have sent many e-mails to her and just have to shake my head at her replies. She needs to go on "Are you smarter than a 5th. grader" . She'd lose. I really don't understand the people of this state. Why would you send a tree knot back to Congress.
Post new comment