Candidate Jon Russell Makes Town Halls Available To Voters - Congressman Baird Heads For Canada And “Phones One In”

By Gary Wiram | 08/08/09 | 07:06 PM EDT | 5 Comments

In a radio interview this past Thursday evening, Jon Russell, Republican Candidate for Congress in Washington’s 3rd District (WA-03), said that he has taken the initiative to arrange a series of Town Halls “from Olympia to Vancouver” during the current Congressional August Recess “so the people can speak”. Russell’s interview was on a Victoria Taft Show (KPAM 860AM Radio) that focused on WA-03’s current Member of Congress, Brian Baird, disparaging Constituents and refusing to face them. When asked for his explanation of Baird’s behavior, Russell offered that it seems like “a symptom of a Career Politician” whose “focus is him, not us”.

Meanwhile, where was Brian Baird? Well, he wasn’t on that Victoria Taft Show. On the same day as that show, he was in Toronto, Canada, giving the Keynote Address to the American Psychological Association Annual Convention. Now there’s a fancy way to duck confronting the electorate! And, what plans did Baird have for engaging with the electorate? When Victoria Taft asked about this, during her last interview with Baird, he said that he had changed to Telephone Town Halls. Here’s how those work, as reported in The Columbian:

  • If you happen to be sitting near a publicly listed Clark County telephone line on the right day at the right time, your phone will ring.
  • In order to avoid software problems, Baird’s office says, the exact date and time will be kept secret from the public.
  • If you answer your landline, an automated message will ask whether you have a question for your Congressman.
  • Press *3, and you’ll be asked your location and the subject of your question.
  • Sitting at his own telephone at an as-yet-undisclosed location, Baird then will choose a name based on its location and the topic.
  • There will be no further pre-screening, Baird said. After the call is over, the recording will be posted on his Web site. 

As of this morning, the article that included the above description had received 184 Comments. The majority of them reflect the following Comment, from Larch Mountain’s Pam Benson, that was included in the article: 

She said she realizes Baird disagrees with her on health care reform. But the lack of town hall meetings makes her feel angrier and more helpless, she said. “He’s supposed to be our representative,” said Benson, a purchasing manager for Portland Cascade Architecture and Engineering in Portland. “He’s supposed to listen to us, whether he’s on our side or not.” Benson said she doesn’t understand why health care reform is moving forward when everyone she talks to seems to oppose it. “We are not nut cases that disagree with this issue,” she said. “There are a lot of very well-informed people that are against this health care thing.” It’s enough to make a Republican like her paranoid, she said. “It makes me feel that there is a conspiracy here to screw up the whole entire United States,” she said with a laugh. “It’s just too much, too fast.”

Although I agree with Jon Russell, that Baird’s behavior on this seems like “a symptom of a Career Politician” whose “focus is him, not us”, he has been a crafty enough Career Politician to get reelected several times so its not surprising that he was, at least, aware of the tumult he had instigated back home. In what seems to have been a move aimed at stemming the tide against him on this matter, Baird hastily scheduled a Telephone Town Hall on Friday. And, today, Baird’s Website trumpets this, saying:

Brian Holds Telephone Town Hall Meeting with 6,000 Constituents

In this article, Baird refers to himself as “The King of Town Halls”. And he says, “Today was an incredible opportunity to talk with thousands of people in Clark County about what is on their mind, and how government can serve them better.”

You may be interested to know that when I came home yesterday, after my workday in Portland, I learned that I had missed out on this “incredible opportunity”. I found a voice mail letting me know that I had been invited to join in this Telephone Town Hall … at 1:01pm on a Friday afternoon. This morning, a 30 minute recording of the Telephone Town Hall was made available on Baird’s Website so, at least, I got to listen to that. For me, it served as another reminder that The Emperor (“The King of Town Halls”) has no clothes and it’s well past time for his Subjects (AKA the Constituents of WA-03) to point that out to him. Here are some of the “highlights” from the recording that you probably won’t get on Baird’s Website:

§BAIRD SPOKE WITH 7 PEOPLE! At the outset of the recording, he says there are 400 people on the call. Just before the next-to-last caller, he says there are 3,500 people on the call. And, as mentioned, on his Website he says there were 6,000 people on the call. BAIRD SPOKE WITH 7 PEOPLE!

§The key issues raised by callers and their frequency was:

o      Health Care – 4

o      Debt-burden being created by government deficit spending – 1

o      Government programs not helping the mainstream – 1

o      Request for Baird to have face-to-face Town Halls – 3

§This was a classic example of “Baird marketing Baird”. In starting the Telephone Town Hall, Baird touted the fact that he is a clinical psychologist. And, with almost every question, he first responded by giving his resume-points on the related topic … “I sit on X committee”, “I introduced Y bill”, etc.

§Likewise, this was another excellent illustration of what Jon Russell pointed out … that Baird’s “focus is him, not us”. A Career Politician, who has been in the same job for over 10 years, should be able to speak coherently on the issues. However, as our REPRESENTATIVE, especially after this long in office, he should have some interest and skill in extracting what the voters want. Here again, you heard a lot about Brian Baird’s views but NOT ONCE DID YOU HEAR BAIRD ASK WHAT THE CONSTITUENTS WANT!

Needless to say, it should be quite interesting to watch the continuing metamorphosis of this situation. One specific I’ll be watching for is Baird’s follow through on an offer made by one caller he did talk to. Nan Malin, Chair of the Pacific County (WA) Republican Party, was one of the 7 who got to speak with Baird. She told Baird it was a disappointment that he was not listening to both sides. Then, in response to his claims of anarchy and threats, she said “Come here to Seaview. I will host a Town Hall in my living room. We can disagree and still have a conversation. I will be your bodyguard.” Baird’s response was “I will take you up on that.” We’ll see. This is the same Brian Baird who told Victoria Taft that having the media participate in his Telephone Town Halls “would take some arranging” but that “it could be done.” So far, nothing has come from that implied promise.

The one part of this that I do have confidence in, as these circumstances continue to unfold, is the brave role that Jon Russell is playing. Of course, he recognizes that no matter what he learns from voters at the series of Town Halls he is hosting “from Olympia to Vancouver”, he is not yet charged with representing that in Congress. However, he is an elected official. Taking this action in response to the tumult instigated by Baird shows that he has the experience and maturity to do what is called for. Beyond that, this clearly demonstrates the leadership of one who has a heart to serve. With that in mind, my hope and prayer is that attendance at Jon Russell’s Town Halls will be overwhelming, both to clearly demonstrate that we appreciate the opportunity Jon is making possible “so the people can speak” and that this courageous “leadership of one who has a heart to serve” is precisely what we want and what we desperately need

 

Print | Email | Share
 

5 Comments | Related Topics »

 

Comments

 
Rep. B. Baird

...and they have the audacity to claim those of us that only ask for free speech are radicals. They say it is a conspiracy and/or propogated by the Rep. Party. It is such a shame that they haven't really come out and listened to what is actually happening in this nation. The electorate is much smarter than they give us credit for. Strong arm tactics aren't the way to do this.

Finally many Americans, all three, left, middle and right are demanding more. Expressing our knowledge and feelings and the Congress isn't liking it. We must continue to bring this back in line.

It is a shame that Contra Costa County in Calif. wouldn't vote their lackey Rep. George Miller out. He is such a disgrace. He only got in office because his father died in office over 30 years ago and folks placed him in office.

When he made a public statement a few years ago that "...you people don't understand what we do back in DC..." I knew we were in trouble. Now it is coming to fruition.

Submitted by Cleon on Sat, 08/08/09 - 07:34 PM » | Print
 
 
Jon Russell

Being from the East Coast, I am not familiar with Jon Russell or Brian Baird, but I find Rep. Baird's actions here completely ludircrous and laughable, if they were not so sad. Is Mr. Russell already in some kind of elected office? He certainly knows what he is dong. I've heard many say, if they were in Congress, they would hold town halls every night until each person who wants to speak has had the chance to speak. It is beyond belief that our congressmen will not speak with us on issues. My congressman, Mel Watt (D-NC12) has been in office 18 years. He doesn't hold town halls. We called yesterday to ask if he would consider it. His office said no. We asked if we could make an appointment to speak with him as there are many critical issues to discuss. His office said no. Time for him to move on. 

Submitted by Miranda on Sat, 08/08/09 - 07:34 PM » | Print
 
 
Jon Russell

Being from the East Coast, I am not familiar with Mr. Russell or Mr. Baird, but Mr. Baird's actions here are ludicrous. Our Congressmen are completely out of touch. Mine, Mel Watt - D, NC12, does not hold town halls, but has been in office 18 years.We called to ask if he would consider one since many constituents are concerned about issues. His office said no. We asked if we could make an appointment to discuss things with them. They said no. Time for him to move on. Does Mr. Russell already hold another elected office? He's doing the right thing. If I were in Congress now, I'd have town hall meetings every night until every person who wanted to speak to me had done so, but only after I had read the entire bill. They are too arrogant to even realize how out of touch they are. Thanks for sharing.

Submitted by Miranda on Sat, 08/08/09 - 07:39 PM » | Print
 
 
Some Clarification

What the Columbian wrote about the tele-conference and how questions were taken is not accurate. I'm no fan of Baird's, but we need to be as truthful as possible while we expose the lies to the left.

I called Baird's office last week asking about town halls and was told they did not know his schedule. So I left all my contact info, name, address, phone number and email to be contacted for any scheduled events.

I was not contacted by Baird's office, but by a third party who gave me all the information to make the call, 30 minutes prior to the actual conference call.

Contrary to what was reported, the questions were live and answered live. We were told to press *3 if we had a question and placed in cue to be selected, by whatever process they used to select us.

I was one selected and asked my question in real time, receiving his reply in real time. I'm not readily accepting his answer as I'm not too sure he would actually support any measure to ensure citizens and congress were placed on the same healthcare coverage. I'll believe it when I see it.

On Baird’s web page they have only the first half hour uploaded currently. I was on in the second half hour. The call lasted an hour with those wanting to ask a question that were not selected told to leave their question after the beep and then they would be selected, supposedly at random and answer taped and uploaded to his page "in the next few days."

This conference call is a sign of cowardice on Baird's part, I feel. Fortunately, we have two fine candidates vying to unseat him, Jon Russell mentioned here and David Castilloin Olympia.

We need to make sure one of these two young men will be setting in Baird's seat after next November.

Submitted by Lew Waters on Sun, 08/09/09 - 02:07 AM » | Print
 
 
Some Clarification

Thanks for the clarification, Lew. Of course, since I didn't get to participate in the "Telephone Town Hall" as it occurred (at 1:01pm on a Friday), I had no idea that what The Columbian published about the process of participating was inaccurate. In the end, my quoting that made no difference to how we both see this in general, as aptly expressed by you: "This conference call is a sign of cowardice on Baird's part."

Submitted by Gary Wiram on Sun, 08/09/09 - 09:08 PM » | Print
 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.